Next prez is...?
And, if you feel so inclined, throw down with predictions further down the road (ie., if McCain loses, will Bobby Jindal be the Republican Obama?).
Printable View
Next prez is...?
And, if you feel so inclined, throw down with predictions further down the road (ie., if McCain loses, will Bobby Jindal be the Republican Obama?).
HEY WHERE'S MY THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE [/squall]
this thread is redundant and sucks
I predict Biff will be looking for a new message board until 2009 come November 5th.
Did he actually make that bet?
poll edited to reflect the true winner of tuesday's election
that would be awesome, however I don't see Ron Reagan's zombie corpse as an option.
Ahahahahaha
Do you really expect him to follow through on that bet? He never follows through when he says he's going to be at any TNL get-togethers.
Sadly, it will be Obama.
Empire will have chance to strike back in 4 years.
Protip: The Empire were the bad guys.
That means he got it right.
They'll be running Jindal in 2012. If McCain wins, Dems run Hillary in 2012.
We all should want McCain to lose. It's really best for everybody.
They certainly had some pretty awesome militia uniform designers, I'll give 'em that.
The Empire was a lot more interesting until it turned out that all the stormtroopers were clones. There's like fifteen "real people" in the entire fucking thing apparently.
I liked 'em better when they were a bunch of random dudes in white suits who couldn't hit shit with a laser gun.
No Bob Barr? No "insert Constitution Party Fuckhead here" guy?
Bobby Jindal would never fly with the Republicans. After all, he graduated from Brown, was accepted to Harvard Medical School and Yale Law School (but turned them down), and got his master's at an Oxford constituent school, so he's obviously an intellectual elitist.
That's why he's going to save the party, if there's anything left to save after this.
It will be interesting to see how the republicans handle this defeat, that's for sure. I have a feeling they're warming up a spot under the Straight Talk Express for Sarah Palin.
When they told you "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again," they lied.
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...1&d=1225739276
Too bad the Bush establishment didn't see that poster four years ago.
Bush isn't running. If your clown wins, blaming Bush is over.
Bonus round! It also applies exceedingly well to sticking with Palin when it became apparent she was an awful choice!
ALSO that logic means you can't mention Clinton! Retry Y/N?
Yeah, it's too bad the affirmative action free pass from the media doesn't work for white women too.
I A'd my F.
Is that less painful than F'ing your A?
I'll ask your mom next time!
Speaking of clueless women...
They're both far more intelligent than the most recent one to post in this thread. I'll bet they know how to use a comma too.
Stop wasting your time posting here and go take a grammar class so you can appear slightly less uneducated.
You do know shooting love is a guy right Yoshi? Because your recent posts would express ignorance towards that fact.
Post your electoral counts and popular vote totals plz.
Bama = 341 EV
Bama 51.5% popular vote
McCain 47% popular vote
This is the biggest load of shit I've ever heard. When Bush was running against Gore, a republican friend of mine once asked me "Do you really want some A+ smarty pants running the country?"
This anti-intellectualism has distilled over the recent years into words like the pejorative "elite." They constantly rail against the educated, and now you have two Republicans with mediocre academic credentials running against a democrat who graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law. This is an indefensible point. The Republican voter base does not value education the same way the democratic base does.
dude
palin went to six times as many colleges as barry!
majority? who the fuck knows. the majority of america is fucking dumb.
but relatively? yeah i think a higher proportion of obama voters compared to mccain voters both value education more and are themselves more educated about the candidates.
sure, there are a lot of stupid, poor, black voters, but there are a lot more stupid, poor, white voters.
Why are you guys even bother to argue about the intelligence of party voters? Both parties have smart/intelligent/successful voters and both parties have idiotic herds. What a retarded circle jerk of an argument.
It's unfortunate that there isn't a demographics section on the ballot:
- Color: Black / White / Yellow / Brown
- Intelligence: Smart / Average / Stupid
- Gender: Boy / Girl / Unknown / All of the Above
- Education: Post Graduate / College / High School / No, thank you
- Sexual Orientation: Straight / Gay / Yes
but ironically just about every uneducated person decides that they should be making more educated people's decisions for them
Does it really come down to knowing where a politician went to school?
I don't know about you Americans - I wouldn't have a clue where our Prime Minister went to school. I don't think it's all that important really.
Part of my job is to write survey questions. I can make the results turn out almost literally any way I want, but I choose to be impartial, because I would like to remain employed. I would not assume the same about all of the polls. The actual ballots are the only true representation in an area like this where it's nearly impossible to be impartial.
It doesn't sound like you have much of a choice there.
If you had already decided to always act in a manner way that will keep you employed then technically you never had a choice. lol that doesn't have anything to do with anything, but the way you framed that phrase was funny, considering you're talking about not framing questions.
But you are right, it's pretty easy to generate numbers that prove whatever point you are trying to make.
sure, but it's not like we have just one or two polls. we have dozens. some from the left, some from the right, some from the middle. and just as you try to stay impartial so you continue to work, so do many of these polls. because even if one goes off the reservation to get some extra buzz now, they're going to be judged on their accuracy when the ballots are counted.
every demographic study i have seen shows that the democratic party skews more educated than the republican party, at least for the past 8 and probably 16 years. now of course there are nobel prize winners in the GOP and dems that are fucking morons. and you can argue about the value of education all you like and i can argue back because that's a value judgement. but really there has got to be a reason why you see rhodes scholar bill clinton stumping for obama and joe the plumber stumping for mccain.
There's no doubt there's a lot of overlap, but I don't believe level of education even has a strong correlation with intelligence. There are a lot of dumbasses with college degrees. I'd like to see something like distribution of people with engineering degrees between the two parties versus people with degrees in underwater basket weaving.
i would argue that underwater basket weaving is inherently an engineering discipline
ew no it isn't
re·pub·lic [ri-puhb-lik] –noun
1. a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them.
This is why Frog doesn't belong on that informed poster list. It's burg and burg alone on that side.
yeah the government does not exist to make people's decisions for them. it exists to make collective decisions that by their very nature cannot be made by individuals. and basically the whole american political spectrum is an argument about which decisions can and cannot by their nature be made by individuals and thus default to the government.
It fascinates me that there are people out there like Frog who honestly think the government is needed to do everything for us. I just can't get my head around coming to that conclusion.
I just didn't understand that knowing someone's school history was a scale of measurement if you were suited to vote for a particular candidate.
How does that contradict what I said? He's making the decisions for them on their behalf, as he has been elected by them to do. They don't have referendums on every issue, so the decision making rests with him to do as he thinks is best for his constituency.
I'm actually really sorry I made this thread.
It's awful and depressing.
Hey I have 5 votes, that's something to build on the for the future.
25 dollars for every TNL'r who has undisputed photographic proof they wrote in Biff for president.
That is not much of base to build on right there.
5000 percent more than you my friend.
HEY WHERE'S MY THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE
Stop bursting my bubble with reality, jerkoff.
Oh right, sorry. Forgot you were a Republican.
aww aww, jerk. still lylas though.