One, they don't control shit, yet. Two, can't you read you stupid teabagger. OCTOBER.
Printable View
One, they don't control shit, yet. Two, can't you read you stupid teabagger. OCTOBER.
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...1&d=1288965555
Meltdown in 3... 2... 1...
That doesn't compute with this. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...Tabs%3Darticle
Read the caption. The graph is total jobs, so 151,000 would just reduce the deficit, rather than add anything. Plus, the graph is old and troll bait.
But, hey, congrats on replacing 151,000 of the 8 million that have been lost since the 2006 midterm electees came on board.
So the implication in your graph is that it's Congress's job to create jobs? I thought that was the job of the poor millionaire business owners who can't afford a 20% tax rateQuote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Still your graph should show an increase since Dec '09 (EDIT: excuse me, Jan '10 thru May '10 were all gains) when the wsj graph shows net gains in jobs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Which essentially mirrors the market and a rebound in '09.
http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=...SP:.INX&ntsp=0
And, I like how it conveniently leaves out data prior to 2003 and the first Bush recession, despite Republicans controlling congress since 1995.
Go look up correlation, Dave, and report back to the class.
Yep. Congress probably shouldn't have planned those terrorist attacks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
Horses!