Like someone said earlier in the thread, good companies don't need unions.
Printable View
Like someone said earlier in the thread, good companies don't need unions.
On the contrary, I think opinion guys like Olbermann, Beck, O'Reilley, Maddow, etc are not "reporters" and make no claims to impartiality (Ok, O'Reilley does, but lol), so I don't really get why this is a problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by squall_vb
No company has needed unions in 50 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by Thief Silver
I love how demonized unions have become. Like the feminists of the early 50's (branded as lesbians, and sexless single women). Now that we have workers rights unions aren't really needed. You're right. The problem is people in unions tend to make more, and have a voice in the power vacuum that is corporate America. I support union rights. I don't trust the man. I'd rather the money go to the every man than the fat cats. I do not, however, support over reaching union powers. There should always be limitations on power. It works both ways.
Unions make the US manufacturers noncompetitive, because unskilled workers make more than their market value. They're a dinosaur that needs its comet.
And please don't make the mistake of thinking that the union bosses aren't at least as crooked fat cats as the corporate executives. The difference is the union bosses don't actually do anything but leech off the employees.
It keeps people in homes. Market value does not match needed income to pay for basic necessities.
Razor, you can't honestly back that just because "it keeps people in homes"
someone always pays,
this is why the conservative media sucks right now. They have lost their minds. They have become the monster they accused everyone else being during the Clinton years.
Ugh. Good video.
Jesus Christ what a pot and kettle that is.