Very well then, I shall put my words into a way that maybe you can understand.
Let's assume for a second that 100,000 is the # of civilian deaths since that is what you're harping on.
1 Million is the # of civilian deaths I am setting as the low point for Saddam. So I will use that because I suspect both #s are generous.
I will use a unit of measurement that allows us to compare these two death tolls that I was trying to cite of an improvement though I stated several times one that would not last because I don't trust the stability of that country.
One hitler shall henceforth be a unit of measurement equal to 6.0*10^6 (Or 6,000,000) human deaths.
Saddam's regime per our #s equates to roughly 1/6th of a hitler.
War in Iraq is roughly equated to 1/60th of a hitler.
Both are tragic losses, but one is 10 times as much as the other.
To clarify:
Saddam Hussein's regime ended in 10 times the innocent deaths (in I believe 3 times or 4 times the span) of the war in Iraq, disregarding timeline and when loss was at a highest.
So if we cut it down the Regime we put out of office was 3.3333 repeating, or if you would like, 2.5 times worse than the war.
250% people are alive today in Iraq because of us. (going for the lowest % along with the rest of the data)
