I probably grasp the concept better than most here.
Most people here have the opinion that they have because they feel that such a system would have benefited them while they were in school and now that they are out of school. They picture a magical ideal where they would have gotten free school and competition for their career would be eliminated.
I realize that it is anecdotal to some degree, but I actually know people who come from countries with fully free colleges. I've talked to at least 30 different people about it. All really smart people. The US sponges them up because by US standards, they are amazing students. But they can not get into a college in their own home countries, or can not get into the programs that they want into because of the really high standards.
Frankly, I would take the word of a very intelligent PhD student over some bachelor of arts kids who wish they didn't have to pay back their students loans, or compete with dumb asses for jobs.
I guess that makes me stupid. But whatever. I got labeled that here a long time ago.
I guess we are both in that lazy boat, because you're too lazy to remember facts. I don't believe that scenario ever happened. But you're free to do a search and quote it.
But if you are trying say that I am defending my own interest, you are probably right. I am in college to fucking learn. Not compete with other people. I enrolled, I paid my fucking money, lets do some learn'n. Others are defending their interest in that they want less competition in the work force, or they want out of debt. I want an environment focused on individual achievement and learning. Not an academic rat race. There is enough of that after you graduate.

