This was the second and final interesting and newly announced game on day one of E3.
Printable View
This was the second and final interesting and newly announced game on day one of E3.
Horrendous dialog aside, I'm very much interested in this. I didn't really get into the second, but the engine is so good and I love open world first-person shooters, so this is staying on the radar.
I was going to try to argue that two interesting new announcements thing, but honestly I can't right now. Everything else I liked has been hinted at previously.
Of course the show hasn't started yet, so whatever.
I am willing to give them another chance. Far Cry 2 should have been so good but they just didn't bother to make a game there.
Someone explain to me what was so good about the first game. I feel like I somehow played it incorrectly.
Far Cry is like Lost. You're stuck on a tropical island and it's boring, with bad dialogue and there are really uninteresting supernatural beings.
I like the 2nd game, it was beautiful and I hope to finish it someday. But I got OCD about collecting the diamonds and forgot about the main missions.
I thought the first far cry was alright, never played the second one though.
I liked it. It was a solid B+ rate single player game. It had vehicles, decent weapons, and introduced new game play elements throughout the game. There really wasn't anything that was SO good. Just a long game with decent elements that was playable enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mzo
Also, keep it in context. There weren't a lot of other new (FPS) games available when it came out. Call of Duty 2 and not much else.
I also liked Far Cry 2, flaws and all. Really looking forward to see what they came up with for 3. Hope they improved the AI.
CoD2 was like a year and a half after Far Cry. Even Half Life 2 was the better part of a year away when Far Cry came out.
Guess I should have clarified, I meant 360.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frogacuda