Printable View
In the offseason we need to look at the max amount of QBs a team can hold. For a 12 man league, 3 is too much. I'm going to recommend, obviously, we limit it to 2. Just take a look at the FA list of QBs.. I can't believe I'm going to start a Redskin QB again.
OK fine I'll drop Palmer. When Bradford is off IR.
Can't cheer for a hometown team in Canada. And screw the Cowboys.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshi
Ya know, I've had a good QB on keeper for a while but I can actually agree with that idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by aren
Yeah, I'd have no problem with that. I can't remember the last time I really needed more than my keeper and a backup on my roster.
Thankfully this week the only player on my bench not on a bye is a 2nd defense so whatever happens I'll know I've got my best lineup on the field.
I have many ideas for the off season. Since our rosters must be capable of every real life play scenario, as demonstrated in our ability to play 5 WR and no RB, we should change the QB slot to QB/RB so I can run the wildcat. This of course means the RB limit will also need to be upped from 4 to 5 (or 6?).
Most definitely no. I'd be fine with changing one or two of the RB/WR slots back to just RB though.
Seconded, though I am not sure a QB/RB slot is even an option. A lot of wild cats just line up the QB at WR, so what we could/should do is have three RB/WR slots, which I tried last year, but was voted down by owners who are bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by stormy
edit: This is also supported by the "Wing T" as mentioned on Wikipedia: "Variations of this can be used, but all would have three RBs in the backfield carrying out fakes."
Welp, I must say I'm happy with snagging Reggie Bush this morning when I heard that Thomas was out.
I think Meach lets that monkey that picks hockey series for TSN set his roster on a weekly basis. If he doesn't, he should.
edit: Now that's teamwork. Lynch fumbled from my bench to get my defense two points. I appreciate the selflessness read: worthlessness