Printable View
What's the implication if they did bring down the building with demolition?
That someone made a judgement call to sacrifice the few for the many?
That you weren't told and consulted? That they haven't answered for it?
What is it you want if the building was brought down by demolitions?
I don't think people in that building died - it fell like, hours after the planes hit and it was evacuated.
I don't want anything.
I have just been raising points.
It is the couple guys here who should answer for why they are so vehemently sure that the government reports are accurate.
And as was illustrated in this thread, most people don't know jack shit about building 7 yet want to procalim that any discussion about it is conspiracy theory nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YellerDog
And dipshits like you come in and act like you know all the answers.
Foundations? right.
It's common sense. Clown anyone who thinks otherwise.
Oh. But it doesn't have anything to do with foundations.
The Truth Is Out There
I think it's possible that building 7 was demolished intentionally. If so, it was for safety reasons and probably a good call. Keep in mind that it was on fire all day and would've collapsed eventually (I still think the gubment report is accurate - this is a hypothetical), maybe in a direction that put a lot of people in harm's way. It was definitely not usable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooting Love
But the question is:
1. Why would the government keep it private - because it's the government, they are stupid.
2. What difference does it make? None.
Shooting Love: Here's a post I made a while back on building 7 and some of that other stuff. A lot of people who side with the government can't be bothered looking stuff up because the whole 9/11 conspiracy thing is pretty tired and dragged out (it's why I'm only linking to a previous post of mine and then probably not posting in this thread again), most people who want to disprove some aspect have no actual proof of anything else, and a lot of the "proof" that WTC is a lie in some fashion is generally based on different circumstances with totally different variables. Even if everything the government reported about 9/11 was 100% fact that doesn't mean we'll ever see the exact same reactions on each individual building in any other plane vs. building incident for the rest of time.
Fe 26's last post in this thread was perfectly placed.
right. which is exactly why I opened my self up to attack from people like Ramon and YellowDog.Quote:
Originally Posted by MechDeus
As I've previously stated. Nothing related to this is going to change the daily course of my life.
I have not considered 9/11 or the theories concerning the collapses at all in my recent life, besides in the course of this thread. Upon seeing this thread and the "hear no evil, see on evil, speak no evil" attitude of some presumably know-it-all posters, I felt it would be something to push some buttons and try to illicit responses from those posters.
How many times did I have to ask about the three buildings and then get answers about airplanes and jet fuel?...
Great. Someone finally linked to the wikipedia entry on building 7. That wasn't so hard. I've read that previously, and I don't necessarily dispute it.
I do dispute clowns trying to stifle any discussion by ridiculing those who raise questions.