Well, the alternatives are either impossible or more immoral.
You either
A. Let people aborted unwanted children
B. Wait for people with a known track record of bad decisions to suddenly start making good ones.
C. Make kids be raised in homes that didn't want them.
D. *Bonus Round* take away all gov hand out programs and socialist programs and wait for the poor/misfortunate/stupid to eat themselves alive and/or die the the gutter.
Why wait on C and D? Why not go ahead and off the kid? Because the kid doesn't get a say? What about the parent's say? It is their genetics. That is a little bit of their body running around. Who gets more say than them? At the moment of termination, a baby is no more intelligent than a foot or leg. Hell, some bugs are probably smarter. Are you going to stop be from killing bugs? I don't even own the bugs. But a mom owns the baby before it develops a brain. It is part of her body. How can you own anything more than you own your own body?
Being against the availability of abortion is not a rational decision. It is almost 100% emotional or at the very least a bad gamble. People take that stance because dead babies make them FEEL bad. Or they want to gamble with the economy with the hopes that suddenly a whole group of people will change.

