Again, that's fine, as long as they provide their own health care to treat any STDs.Quote:
Originally Posted by GohanX
Printable View
Again, that's fine, as long as they provide their own health care to treat any STDs.Quote:
Originally Posted by GohanX
Not to mention it's the only context in which they are "pro-life." Most of them support capital punishment, wars of intervention, letting the poor die of treatable diseases, meat-eating (yeah I do too, but I don't blather about "the sanctity of life" as the burger grease drips from my lips), and, oh yeah, belong to history's most successful death cult.Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc Holliday
It's hard to be as consistent as "do whatever you want and make someone else pay for its consequences" applied to every situation.
At what point does the public health interest override Jiminy Crotch Cricket morality?
What public health interest? You mean Susirresponsible's personal convenience interest?
Because disease is always who deserves it. Say your kid gets a blood transfusion, or has a bad date with Billy Garbagedick in ten years...?
I thought you were talking about abortion. Did you change gears back to condoms?
Did you?
Again, that's fine, as long as they provide their own health care to treat any STDs.
What public health interest? You mean Susirresponsible's personal convenience interest?
Nope, post #465 was about abortion.
I consider "too many damn people" a public health interest.
Fewer children benefiting the mothers is a side-effect to the wider public not having to pay for said children, but is also A Good Thing.