Yeah, I've heard people call Colorado God's country too. It's not an Ohio thing.
Printable View
Yeah, I've heard people call Colorado God's country too. It's not an Ohio thing.
It makes sense for a place w/epic grandeur:
Alaska, for instance. I could buy Colorado.
But lol at Ohio. What a dump.
so apparently only one unit in Philly can play well per game
I expected the Eagles to lose.
I also expected this season to be a lost cause.
I am not disappointed yet.
Hey atleast they haven't traded McCoy!
Philadelphia is so fucked this season. They beat Washington in RGIIIs first game back and now two losses in a row.
If the can't beat the chargers or the cheifs at home they are sure as fuck not going to walk into Denver and get a W.
I already had the Denver game down as a loss.
So ... now what, Opaque?
Wait, you mean you think Philadelphia will lose to the Broncos?
I'm picking the Eagles and their players every week in the other ESPN fantasy games if it's going to continue to jinx the shit out of them.
Some of the "analysis" of the Richardson deal has been interesting. Holmgren is big time against it. However, Jeffri Chadiha makes some compelling points in favor of it. My take is pretty simple. If you're going to build a winner, you absolutely cannot start with the RB. The reason is also simple. RBs have shorter careers than any other position. By the time you get the rest of the nucleus in place, your RB is going to be on the slide. Based solely on that, without even taking Richardson's talent into account (which is hard to measure in Cleveland anyway), I think it was a good deal for the Browns longer term.