More studios should have thought of that in the first place, IMO.
Printable View
More studios should have thought of that in the first place, IMO.
Well, yeah, but a lot of reviewers and idiot consumers have pushed them away from it.
I remember people whining about Portal 1 being too short (despite being perfect), so I think developers have been gun-shy about it since.
All the reviews I'm reading say the game goes on longer than it should. Seems to be sharply dividing critics.
I don't think it's being sharply divided by critics, as much as showing which outlets are foolish.
Polygon, IGN and Gamespot gave it 6.5, 5.9 and 6 while others are 8s and 9s.
Yeah, Eurogamer's reviews are usually the most spot on IMO, so I'm sold.
Like I said, the atmosphere and other future from the 70's tech feel is there. That'll be the same on whatever platform you play, so I'm stoked to get the PC version on release.
Terminals looking like Apple IIe's, ghetto blasters, vhs type distortion in certain spots.
It's all good.
That's about as ringing an endorsement as I can think of.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chux
That's what I'm saying! They do it to themselves.
Pretty much the only mainstream site I usually agree with. Just waiting for their Digital Foundry analysis and I'll go from there.Quote:
Originally Posted by bbobb