So why isn't any news channel reporting that one of the grand jury witnesses appears to have been assassinated last night and then set on fire in his car?
Printable View
So why isn't any news channel reporting that one of the grand jury witnesses appears to have been assassinated last night and then set on fire in his car?
...wait, what?
This story is about the killing. I don't think they released the names of the witnesses, but there's lots of speculation on more fringe sites and social media that he was the guy who told the grand jury that the criminal ran at the cop.
Smells bullshitty.
"Boy am I furious at the legal system and authorities! I'm going to set a Little Ceasar's on fire!"
It's no wonder change never happens in this country. People are idiots with no ability to focus.
What would be a better alternative? Send Ben Franklin to talk to the king? Yeah, that works.
This is the sort of stuff a trial is supposed to sort out.
Not to be a split the baby type of guy but come on. There was obviously enough cause to indict. Probably not enough to convict, but definitely enough to indict. The prosecutor didn't want to indict so he tanked it in the most obvious way. That's what is annoying. It's not justice, it's just crap. The prosecutor shouldn't be working as the defendant's inside man, and that's exactly what he did.
Same thing as the Rapeis Winston case.
Yoshi has a great point. The media really needs to give us more sensational footage of the violent reactions and less of the hundreds of peaceful protests across the nation.