http://www.the-nextlevel.com/tnl/att...1&d=1430420434
Printable View
The Democrats still cater to the union bosses for some reason, right? They seek out endorsements and get on stage with them and what not.
Whose belief? I doubt they're lying to themselves, and union bosses don't care about union workers any more than the Democrats do. They both just want their cut.
Why are we talking about unions in a us with republican supported farm subsidies?
And how do unions relate to this thread?
I don't get it? He's not doing anything edgy for today's US, much less Seattle.
Edit: Maybe he was homeschooled and is taking out his adolescent frustration against his Christian parents on Seatle's street people, but it's hardly conflicting or entertaining. Now if he was at the protest in Baltimore signing Fuck Mike Brown, Fuck Thieves, Fuck Drug Dealers, and Fuck this Clown. That would be entertaining.
It devolved from bbobb's claim about police, but it was also related to the urban voting patterns.
As you know, I'm not a fan of farm subsidies, but I suspect less food would be produced if they were taken away, which would add a different problem for Baltimore or exacerbate an existing one.
That is what I was allowing to be insinuated, yes.
Right.Quote:
union bosses don't care about union workers any more than the Democrats do.
So. Do we allow that this is the case, for purpose of further discussion (and possibly having any other questions be answered)?
Can we attribute urban voting patterns to something more specific (or at least more expansive) than union buyout and sway?