Printable View
I think Namco rips off the Sega shit and then repackages it by making more marketable.
Basically, RidgeRacer is like a Daytona 2.0, Tekken a Virtua Figter 1.2 and Timecrisis a Virtuacop 1.5.
I may be wrong on what came out first but Namco has always owned the Arcades and Consoles.
Well, I dont care about this, as long as said rips are better then originals :)
Say it!
SEGA!
Agreed. Nothing was worse for me than having to choose between two of my favorite all-time developers, Capcom and Konami, in that earlier "Versus" thread.Quote:
Originally posted by sggg
Hrm... I dunno, but I am beginning to think I don't like "versus" threads.
Although some good did come out of it because it made me realize that Konami is my favorite developer ever.
I like the versus threads where there are fair contenders like Nintendo vs Sega, Capcom vs Konami. But one's like this, where one developer is(should be) the obvious choice, I don't think there's a big need for.
This does remind me of Capcom vs. SNK around 1994 if you stick Capcom in Sega's place and SNK in Namco's.
When Capcom brings out the Super SFII series, SNK really gets serious (Garou reference intended :D ) and voila... Here's King of Fighters '94. While some people may call it a SF rip, it did quite a handful of things better (what other game at the time had 3 on 3 battles?). I found it better than the SFII series.
Three years before, SNK did blow away the first Street Fighter ('87) with Fatal Fury ('91). Special moves in FF are easy to perform, unlike the ones in SF1.
Ah, competition is good.
Quote:
Originally posted by Despair
Well, I dont care about this, as long as said rips are better then originals :)
Agreed. Mega Man all the way!!!Quote:
Originally posted by MajinRyu
Namco and Konami got noting on Capcom, I even prefer capcom over Sega
Yea but right now Capcom and SF3rd Strike beat the crap out of any SNK fighter ever created, hell! beat the crap of any fighter ever created :)Quote:
Originally posted by gameoverDude
This does remind me of Capcom vs. SNK around 1994 if you stick Capcom in Sega's place and SNK in Namco's.
When Capcom brings out the Super SFII series, SNK really gets serious (Garou reference intended :D ) and voila... Here's King of Fighters '94. While some people may call it a SF rip, it did quite a handful of things better (what other game at the time had 3 on 3 battles?). I found it better than the SFII series.
Three years before, SNK did blow away the first Street Fighter ('87) with Fatal Fury ('91). Special moves in FF are easy to perform, unlike the ones in SF1.
Ah, competition is good.
Well, If it was Sega VS Capcom - Capcom would win 100% !!!