Fear The Time Cube!!! ("scientists are stupid asses")

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cubehead

I'm not Gene Ray, if that's what you mean; I'm merely a Cube-follower. On my website, Cubic Awareness Online, I explain the Time Cube principle as I understand it. Check it out!

(SomethingAwful's Learning Triangle is but a single-corner fraud.)

---

PENIS!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brisco Bold

PENIS!

---

Touch it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wildkat

All we need next is the Goatse guy to post here..

---

What type of things would he post about? Anal exercises and eating crimpets while drinking tea?

ok, wtf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AstroBlue

Look up Zeno of Elea's Paradoxes and their solutions, nigga.

---

As far as I'm concerned, infinity-paradoxes are resolved simply through using a quantised model. I don't see how they could disprove the 4-corner-quadrant division.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AstroBlue

A universal measure which is determined only by the rotation of a single body in that universe? CubeTime is as Universal as UTC.

---

Actually, all stars, galaxies, planets, and any gravitationally significant body, have their own Cubic parameters and 4/16 rotation. We focus mainly on Earth's Cube-parameters because they are the ones most relevant to us. See Formation of Cosmological Entities.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Josh

Yeah, that website doesn't work.

---

It should work, although it sometimes takes a while to load. If not, try this link.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brisco Bold

PENIS!

---

A penis has top, bottom, front, back, 2-sides -- Cubic parameters. Furthermore, males have 2 testicles and females 2 ovaries; during sexual intercourse, they are united as a total of 4 gonads. 4 is the supreme number of the Universe.

I'd be much more interested in what you had to say if you'd tell me how it works, rather than what it is in a different way each sentence. No broken links, no vague BS, please. I wanna hear something concrete from the horse's mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TrialSword

I'd be much more interested in what you had to say if you'd tell me how it works, rather than what it is in a different way each sentence. No broken links, no vague BS, please. I wanna hear something concrete from the horse's mouth.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brisco Bold

PENIS!

---

Yeah.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TrialSword

I'd be much more interested in what you had to say if you'd tell me how it works, rather than what it is in a different way each sentence. No broken links, no vague BS, please. I wanna hear something concrete from the horse's mouth.

---

Your post has 45 words. 45 is half of 90, and we all know that a square is made of four 90 degree angles.

Thus, you already know half the answer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cubehead

A penis has top, bottom, front, back, 2-sides -- Cubic parameters

---

Does your penis look like a rectangular brick or something? A penis has three sides: dorsal oblique left, dorsal oblique right (corpus spongiosum) and ventral (corpora cavernosa). But yes, you could divide the penis into four sides, you could abstractly divide it how many sides you want. But what the fuck would that prove?

How does the knowledge of CubicTime effect our lives at all? What would a cube follower do differently from the "educated stupid"? Apart from eating out of trashcans, making gaudy websites, and failing to be coherant?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cubehead

I don't see how they could disprove the 4-corner-quadrant division.

---

Nothing can disprove the "4-quadrant division" because it's completely conceptual and abstract; it would be like saying disprove Coordinated Universal Time, the Catholic Religion, the colour blue, Harry Potter, etc. If something cannot be disproven with a hypothetical question, than it is of no absolute value.

Tell me a hypothetical question or discovery that would disprove TimeCube?


The universe is infinite, I really couldn't give a fuck if you divide it by 1, 4, 6, 8, 1.61803398874989.., it's going to still be the same infinite thing. If you can't understand infinity than you're a narrow sighted dogmatic dumbass. But go on and explain your "quantised model".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sethsez

Your post has 45 words. 45 is half of 90, and we all know that a square is made of four 90 degree angles.

Thus, you already know half the answer.

---

:lol:

Astro has successfully and succinctly verbalized just about every criticism I had that I couldn't put into words fast enough.

Truly, the apparent power of cubism is related to the abstract nature of its foundation. It's all based on numbers, of human cultural invention, being applied to a universe that eludes any sort of simple understanding.