Well, possibly that. But only for the amount of effort he's exerting. He won't make a good troll with all that trying though. When trolls try, they lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
Printable View
Well, possibly that. But only for the amount of effort he's exerting. He won't make a good troll with all that trying though. When trolls try, they lose.Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
Time Cube makes my head hurt.
I dunno, I appreciate the research he's put in. Better than rapping or pretending to be a dictator or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tracer
Indeed, but trolling is about causing the maximum amount of hostility from the least amount of effort. He's only getting the occasional "dig" for a hell of a lot of time and effort...Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
Diff can just quote someone, type LAWL and cause a whole avalanche of flaming... that's a troll.
That's why I'd put him more in the category of joke account rather than troll.
Agreed. What the hell are they doing with our tax dollars!?Quote:
scientists are stupid asses
*RCK goes back to his experiments*
I dunno timecube has always struck me as numerology but with geometric patterns rather than finding patterns of numbers or reooccuring themes with a certain number. Take 17 and 23, two numbers with minimal mathmatical value that pop up EVERYWHERE if you look hard enough. Its not because there's a conspiracy or they have some sort of hidden merit.
Its because humans by nature are extremely good at both creating and recongizing patterns of any sort, they will use them any try to apply them as far as possible because patterns are a good way of framing any sort of new data into an old data set.
What humans are really terriable at is determining the validity of patterns. Hence things like racial stereotypes, certain isms and such persist. Not to say they X pattern of behavior does/n't exsist, but the pattern searching/matching and reasoning of humans is extremely good to the point of fault when we want to see certain results.
Take google, search for waffles, and you'll get john kerry's website, not anything about breakfast goodness. The search is sound but people have applied waffles to a politician, what most people don't do internally is refine the search to weed out politicians and pancakes.
The square is projected between the two static opposites (north and south poles) to form a Cube, as explained in Cube Representation.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Why is the equator non-circular? I think it's because of the influence of other gravitational bodies. If you disregard that influence, gravity and rotation give a circular equator.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Like the precession of the Earth's axis, the elliptical orbit is a cyclical imperfection; the orbit itself orbits the sun, yielding a flower-like circular figure. I am quite sure that for orbital equilibrium, there must ultimately be a circular pattern. Also, I already said that Phi and the golden spiral are explained in Cycles, Systems and Complexities in Nature.
You need to show how the *, + and ^ operations are significant in terms of the universe's geometry and underlying laws. Within Time Cube, 2 is significant in terms of static opposites; the same principle of correlation between a square and the 4-quadrant division of a plane, applies to a linear segment and the halving of a linear dimension. So I guess you could say 2, in addition to 4, is significant.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
It will help to eliminate the brainwashing perpetrated by Christianity and other evil 1-corner religions; since Time Cube transcends, contradicts and debunks God, it will provide a Truth that people are likely to prefer over the Cubeless 1-cornerisms. And since it forces people to think for themselves rather than blindly accepting a pre-defined morality, people will be more likely to take action to aid the community of which they are a part, rather than focusing on gaining an advantage in the imagined afterlife.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
If you are talking about a mathematical formula, you should know that Time Cube is more about the geometrical principles and not so much the symbolic manipulations typical of existing mathematics. We could ask the question "Does a omniscient/omnipotent human-form god exist"; the solution exists within the Cube-geometry, in that the totality is 4 corners and a self is 1-corner, meaning that a 1-corner god doesn't exist. See article Religion.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
It changes any theory that asserts non-cyclical phenomena, so for instance, it contradicts any big-bang theory that involves there being infinite post-big-bang expansion. If there was a big bang, it would have to be opposed by a big crunch; this would create a 4-corner cycle of bang-expansion-contraction-crunch.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Furthermore, Academians might create a little computer-simulation of a planet going around the sun, or something like that, and say "Who needs Cubic time, this linear time model works fine". But in fact, to produce the simulation, they would have to iterate their linear-time formulae many times to create a series of positions for the planet and star. This process of iteration equates to a 4-corner cubic cycle; so to model the Cubic reality, the Word-bastards do in fact have to invoke Time Cube. But they deny this, and are so evil as to engage in the bastardly-queer 1-corner linear-time self-aggrandising.
You didn't know that the 4-supremacy could be used to prove 4 simultaneous days in a single rotation of Earth, nor that Time is Cubic, not Linear. This is because the Academians will only teach you the stuff that appears not to contradict their 1-corner Cubeless worldview.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
The harmony is between 2 things. Those two things are the set of four 90-degree angles in the centre, and the set of four 90-degree angles in the square's corners. No other limiting shape has this harmonicity. (The square is projected perpendicularly to form a dilated cube.)Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
No, it's related to the circle in that the circle encompasses 360 degrees of a plane, which may be divided into 4 right-angles; and it is a finite figure, which is a property representable by a bounding square, a square composed of 4 right-angles at its extremities.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Actually they are ellipsoidal rather than spherical, due to the dilation caused by their axial rotation. As explained in Cube representation, the natural representation for this is the dilated Cube.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Yes, and the harmonicity of the 4-corner-quadrant division is related to the 4-simultaneous days and Cubic-Time in that it is used to prove them.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
The precession is another cycle that may be disregarded to focus solely on the day-night cycle. The sunrise/sunset would be equally spaced on the autumn/spring solstices. Since uranus has an extreme axis tilt, it doesn't have much of a day-night cycle. Development of any life thereon would be impaired since it would not have that cycle to regulate it.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
The perfect harmony exists in the fundamental laws of the universe. The planets were formed as a product of cosmological evolution, which involves Chaos and the perfect Cubic laws working together. The product is a body that is somewhat chaotic, but is quite close to Cubic perfection.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Actually 12:Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
01. YOU are the lowest form.
02. YOU can't procreate alone.
03. YOU destroyed the village.
04. YOU destroyed the family.
05. YOU destroyed childhood.
06. YOU destroyed naturalism.
07. YOU don't know the Truth.
08. YOU pitiful mindless fools, YOU are educated stupid.
09. YOU worship cubeless word.
10. YOU are your own poison.
11. YOU create your own hell.
12. YOU must seek Time Cube.
But are you afraid of the KNOWABLE? Can you move beyond the infinite and see the world as an understandable entity within which your actions have consequences, consequences for which you must accept responsibility?Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Aha, this is an interesting thought: between the static opposites of the left and right halves, there exists a 4-corner rotation. So for instance, the heart has 4 chambers through which blood is pumped. I think that the rotational forms between the opposites may be considered to represent Cubic geometry.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Just divide it into 4 corner quadrants and draw a square around it, corresponding to the quadrants, as shown in 4 is the supreme number of the universe. That's the only way in which a circle truly requires squaring.Quote:
Originally Posted by IronPlant
No, those are all unnatural ideals that society has brainwashed you to worship. Time Cube grants us understanding of the natural law, thus allowing us to live and evolve in greater harmony with the Nature of which we are an inextricable part.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
To some extent, we go by our intuition, the instincts that have evolved to facilitate our compliance with the natural law. However, we also have intelligence, and so we can use our powers of rationality and problem-solving to make decisions. That is where Time Cube is useful, for it gives us the wisdom to make more informed decisions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The cars and TV are fictitious manmade entities, and the languages are most likely Cubeless. Furthermore, if you speak languages of other races, that could facilitate de-evolutionary racial conflation. The numbers are unimportant here, as owning 4 TV's doesn't have anything to do with 4 as it relates to the 4-corner-quadrant division of circles and cycles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
It's not just that a lot of shit is related to 4, it's that ALL shit has the Cubic geometry, including the 4-division, as its underlying basis. Carbon and water are but single constituents of life; it is more wholesome to worship life and Nature in its entirety.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Actually, I believe that Cubic acceptance will come not from defeated Academians, but from free thinkers who are disillusioned with the beliefs offered as truth by society, Academia and religion. Right now, we must spread the Cubic truth, so that those who seek truth are likely to find it.Quote:
Originally Posted by TrialSword
I think that the mormonism has survived for the same reason that Christianity as a whole has survived; out of all the proposed religions, theirs happened to catch on and perpetuate. Evolution is evident in religions; there are many variations in specific beliefs between all people classifying themselves as Christians. The religions diversify, and if they perpetuate long enough, will most likely eventually branch into belief systems so different that they must be considered separate religions.
No joke, sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
Give some examples of where 17 and 23 are evident.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsKitten
I think that stereotypes and irrational beliefs probably originate from observed truths, but once they are accepted into the culture, people will unquestioningly believe them, and since there's no validation, the beliefs may mutate to the point where they are no longer truthful.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsKitten
Does Cubehead play Game Cube?
Does he like Picaso?
New signature. This guy is great! :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Dammit! You beat me to it. I'll have to stick with Che I guess....Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
I love the Mario hat :tu:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Does it really? I must have missed that part in the all omnipotent math book of the cube. If Time Cuber's dont believe in God, how can it debunk Him? Dont you have to prove he exists before you debunk Him? (Sorry about the capital 'H' in him - I'm a part of that evil 1 corner cult)Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
http://www.illegaluturn.com/dbimages...nchCaramel.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by cubehead
Will this do?
Cubehead I know your secret -Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
http://www.memory-alpha.org/en/uploa...OfBorg2367.jpg
http://www.memory-alpha.org/en/uploa.../Borg_cube.JPG
Which does what for me exactly? Do I at least get a Time Cube company car, or what? And those arent brainwashed ideals. I would be at great harmony with nature if I won the lottery, looked like the Rock, and could live forever.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
:lol: okay, now this I want you to elaborate on.Quote:
Originally Posted by cubehead
Cubehead, to achieve enlightenment, you must come out of your cave and into the 21st Century.Quote:
Originally Posted by cubehead
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...chmentid=13928Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
So you're claming that if I take a point inside any shape it will not encompass 360 degrees? HAHAHA...Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
No it's only disregarded because you're a fucking moron... the axis would only completely "average out" if it stayed in the exact same place as it orbit, but it's not, it's precessing while the earth is orbiting the sun. As for Uranus, animals live and evolve quite happily in the polar extremities where there is no day-night cycle, and how would you know? Saying that Cubic Time is not discounted by Uranus not having a day-night cycle because according to Cubic Time it wouldn't lead to life evolving is a tautology; your testing a theory using itself. You're making rules up, deciding what is relevant or not, to ensure the survival of your own "Word Virus".Quote:
Originally Posted by CubeHead
Nup, not absolute. I understand that if I light a match I will probably start a fire, and if I call a big tattooed dude a "fag" I will probably get beaten up. But I will never be like Laplace's Demon and know everything, that's impossible, you can't understand everything about something you are inside of, and especially not with this cubic bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by CubeHead
AHA, YOU'RE A FUCKING MORON, there are animals with chambers of hearts that aren't 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by CubeHead
Where are you getting this "we" thing from? There's not enough uneducated smart people that will fall for your bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
So basically you've taken a very well-known principle in mathematics and have applied all sorts of schizophrenic delusions onto it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
k
THE SUPER DUPER REALLY DUMB SMELLY MATH-BUTT-DICKSQuote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Well, guys I'm sold. I must embrace Time Cube.
Sure, it's moronic and based in no way on rational evidence, but then niether is any other religion / cult.
In the case of theWrenchbearers, it was primarily based on boredom and one too many save files of Ratchet and Clank. That seems rational to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
take it from someone who knows how to make a secret society: it's good if they can relate.
Yeah. Any religion has a strong basis in faith. If Time Cube makes Cubehead a better person, than it cant be all that bad a thing. I dont really understand it too well,but I'm no mathematician, so no big surprise there.Quote:
Originally Posted by g0zen
Like someone else said earlier in the thread, at least he keeps coming back, and tries to get his point across. That's a lot more than the quick spamming "Jesus freaks" do around here.
Circles cannot exist without acceptance of infinite.
That was g0zen himself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
All belief systems have a little faith, some more than others... but one thing they definitely all have is value to the "vector" of the belief, otherwise a belief structure will die with the person.
Religion provides easily understood concrete morality and a purpose that relates to the "human condition": we're scared of the temporality of life, so it fixes that with the afterlife; we're scared we really don't have a purpose and we're just a lump of chemicals doing stuff, so it fixes that with being a servant of God; a society with murder and stealing is not beneficial, so it says the Devil will stab your arse with a pitchfork if you steal or murder; eating unproperly refrigerated shellfish and pig meat is highly dangerous, so it forbids consuming them on historical grounds. There could be a God, but even if there is no God... religion still has its place and value in society. And science's value is straight forward, it helps us better understand our physical world in a way that allows us to shape it; they're both far from perfect, but they have their place.
Now... so what is Time Cube's value? That's simple. Think of a TimeCube website with frames, all the information is written in completely dry language and politely explains how the square is perfectly harmonious with the circle and all philosophy deriving from that, there is no mention of "GOD IS CORNERED AS A QUEER" and "Santa God. God evolves from Santa."... it's all in completely formal coherent language... like CubeHead's website but even more "normal". Now look at the real Time Cube website... the difference is TimeCube's value and the reason FirstBlood linked us to it in the first place.
I seriously hadn't visted the main TimeCube website for ages, I was only going to CubeHead's website...
Socrates has a mid-day
Clinton's have a sun-down
Einstein has a mid-night
Jesus has a sun-up
I'm sorry I wasted Nick's bandwith by actually giving this guy the time of day (eer... times of d4y).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
What the fuck? You're taking what I said seriously? Stop doing that. I was just kidding around. This guy is a wacko moron, fo' sho.
#1 the 17/23 is just an illustration of a point. Go watch a movie and look for 23 or 17 in it. Eventually it'll appear everywhere. Its just a mental exersize it really means nothing at all. Here's a link about people finding it everywhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
http://www.geoman.com/jim/about23notes.html
#2 Yes you've agreed with me.
:lol: :lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
"Synchroncity is not magical, it's not mystical, and it's not due to quantum mechanics. A specific coincidence doesn't offer any more insight into the Universe than any other act of valuation, because meaning doesn't exist outside of that act of valuation.
How many coincidences happen that you don't notice, because they don't mean much to you? How many times have you thought of a friend, and the phone didn't ring? You don't keep track of those - it's the coincidences that mean something which trigger your memory, so over time, the 'meaning' in the Universe appears to increase.
Synchronicity, however, does offer insight into statistics.
The reason we experience Synchronicity is because there are so many possible ways that unusual coincidences could happen, that it is far more probable that some will happen, than for none of them to happen, ever.
Like the human propensity for recognizing faces easily, our minds find patterns which don't exist in the events themselves. Attributing meaning to coincidences is a mirror-spell: an illusion which tells us only about ourselves, and what we consider meaningful, like Tarot or Astrology. "
Timeism - God is evil because he is 1 sided.
Religion - Timeism is evil because it promotes a false religion to the world.
Honestly I like buddhism most, because it does not denounce anything else, it really just says "try it out". Timecubeism just seems like it could attract the type of people who were always pretty good at math, but not great, yet still liked it. Those who had to focus on the immediate princibles without letting thier mind wander, without allowing themselves to see the larger pictures and patterns that come. Now, when all the patterns some of us already see are all thrown at them, they are overwhelemed and convinced.
I like 3, 3 is far more useful, triangles are much more useful that squares.
No, like Gene Ray, I don't have much time to get into the games. GameCube is actually but a fictitious manmade entity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces & Eights
No, you just have to define him; you can then debunk him by showing that given that definition, it would be impossible for him to exist within the proven Cubic universal geometry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Having big muscles wouldn't be so bad, but the lottery involves fictitious manmade money which relates not to Nature but to the manmade Word-society, and living forever would deny the 4-corner cycle of baby-child-parent-grandparent and the self as merely a temporary component of the truly immortal body, which is the Village.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The different races evolved to have unique traits that make them suited to different climates, habitats, etc. They evolved differently for a purpose, and it's possible that if the unique traits are preserved, they may evolve into entirely separate species. That's how evolution occurs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Excessive racial mixing/conflation, however, cancels out the unique qualities, inducing a racial slop. That would be anti-evolution. There needs to be some degree of separation between the different races -- and if you all speak the same language, or speak each other's languages, that could potentially be something that causes you to overlook the inherent differences between the races. See Implicit Cubic Selection in the Village.
I'm claiming that those 360 degrees will only be harmonic to that shape if it's a quadrilateral with 360 degrees; and that a perfect 4-90-degree division of the inner 360-degrees is harmonic only to the 4-90-degree-corner square.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
But we average out BOTH the cycle of seasons AND the cycle of precession, thus focusing solely on the Earth's day-night rotation. I already explained this; and if the non-moronic option is to take everything into account, then I guess if you were analysing the movement of a car on a road, you would take into account the speed of the road around Earth's axis, and the speed of the Earth moving around the sun, and the sun moving around the galaxy-centre... etc. Or maybe, the less moronic option would be to disregard the things not relevant to the specific concept you are analysing?Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
It's possible that life exists there, but I think that its evolution would be impaired -- not necessarily entirely prevented -- by the lack of a well-defined day-night cycle. I'm not claiming that Uranus' lack of day-night cycle is accounted for by the unobserved phenomenon of life not existing (which I don't think is necessarily the case anyway); rather, it is caused by Chaos, which coexists with Time Cube, and facilitates Cubic evolution. Its tilt was probably caused by chance collisions with other planets.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
I already explained the absurdity of making an absolute claim that it's impossible to understand the universe. As for being "inside of" it, see the rational belief. I am thinking that your claim that Time Cube is bullshit is based merely on prejudice, as you have not given any legitimate refutation of it. Your proposed refutation of the harmonicity is no good, as you ignored the actual harmonicity itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
I would have to examine their geometries to evaluate them. Which animals are they?Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
It may be that humanity is too stupid and evil to accept Time Cube and evolve into Supermen; regardless, I believe it is my duty to spread the word. I'm not forcing it on anyone, just making it available so that anyone inclined towards Truth will be aided in their search. Existentialism is really what it's all about; people making decisions as to what they think is good and evil, and not necessarily believing in morality imposed upon the population by Academic/religious institutions.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Time Cube is a rational belief system, based on faith in rationality -- see the rational belief.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Behold:Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
http://img235.exs.cx/img235/4571/circle3dv.gif
This figure is clearly recognisable as a circle, yet it is composed of little finite pixels. It's the same with a discrete, quantised universe.
As a self, God is 1-corner; and a queer that doesn't reproduce as part of a normal 4-corner family unit is cornered as 1-corner. God has no mother and father, and no wife. He is cornered as a queer.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
The principle of God evolving from Santa is simple: children are taught to associate the gifts with the imaginary character, so that trains them to believe in tall stories. Then, when they are older, the Santa-conditioning makes it easier to brainwash them into believing in a false spirit of God.
I haven't really experienced anything like that, with recurring numbers. It could be that once you identify those specific numbers, you take notice of their occurrence, and disregard other numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsKitten
I think that we must consider that even if these numbers have some special significance, what exactly is that significance? Hence it is better to prove significance of numbers than to merely infer it from various disconnected experiences; from the proof, we may understand what the significance actually means to us. I have shown the significance of 4, square, circle, golden ratio, Fibonacci sequence, which are mentioned in the article you linked to.
Wait, the GameCube is manmade? You've gotta be shittin' me :wtf:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
I know... I thought GameCubes reproduced in the Hoikkado savanaha and Nintendo were just some "rustlers" that captured the GameCubes, domesticated them, and then sold them to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
As I showed in the diagram, the shape in the middle doesn't matter it's like a spoiler and fluro lights on a Suburu Impreza.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
LAWLQuote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Anti-evolution, that's a good one ;)
Now:ThenQuote:
Originally Posted by Cubic Time
Consistency in your beliefs would be nice. It seems you've realised precession is relavent, so you're adding that to the TimeCube's WordVirus... it seems it just evolved another defense to ensure its survival. Score one for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubic Time
That's not a true circle, that's a representation of a circle using a matrix of pixels but the human mind tells you it's a circle because of top-down processing. Start dividing a true mathematically represented circle, and come back to me when you "can't divide it any more".Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubic Time
So you believe the universe is not infinitely divisible? HAHAHAHAHAHA. Seriously, go have a look at the solutions of Zeno's Paradox... anybody who is too stupid to understand the reality of infinity should not be basing their whole belief structures on maths.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubic Time
Seriously, have you been taking your Solian? Don't flush it down the toilet.
You don't know what "ficticious" means, do you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
It exists. It isn't meaningful in any way, but it exists. You dumbshit.
Where do great-grandparents fit into this? Why do you arbitrarily stop at grandparents?Quote:
Having big muscles wouldn't be so bad, but the lottery involves fictitious manmade money which relates not to Nature but to the manmade Word-society, and living forever would deny the 4-corner cycle of baby-child-parent-grandparent and the self as merely a temporary component of the truly immortal body, which is the Village.
So what's the scientific definition of "harmonic" anyway?Quote:
I'm claiming that those 360 degrees will only be harmonic to that shape if it's a quadrilateral with 360 degrees; and that a perfect 4-90-degree division of the inner 360-degrees is harmonic only to the 4-90-degree-corner square.
Hahahahaha.Quote:
As a self, God is 1-corner; and a queer that doesn't reproduce as part of a normal 4-corner family unit is cornered as 1-corner. God has no mother and father, and no wife. He is cornered as a queer.
Wow. That is some serious 14-year old philosophy you have going there. Especially coming from someone asking us to accep a square as the ultimate harmonious shape which will allow us to evolve into Supermen through some vague process of enlightenment somehow.Quote:
The principle of God evolving from Santa is simple: children are taught to associate the gifts with the imaginary character, so that trains them to believe in tall stories. Then, when they are older, the Santa-conditioning makes it easier to brainwash them into believing in a false spirit of God.
No, you haven't. You use circular logic, huge leaps of logic, and selective sampling (attributing 4 to certain things while ignoring all the places it doesn't exist) to make your points which are incoherant in and of themselves, and then you come to conclusions that have nothing to do with them. Even if timecube is a reasonable theory, I still haven't seen why it needs to be worshipped or integrated into everyday life. Other mathematical and scientific theories aren't worshipped or taken as gospel, and you haven't shown why this should be, beyond saying "here, it works, now live your life by it!"Quote:
I think that we must consider that even if these numbers have some special significance, what exactly is that significance? Hence it is better to prove significance of numbers than to merely infer it from various disconnected experiences; from the proof, we may understand what the significance actually means to us. I have shown the significance of 4, square, circle, golden ratio, Fibonacci sequence, which are mentioned in the article you linked to.
Please, keep going though. Your insanity is quite amusing.
Sig.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
...a few questions about this 4 days in 1 roation thing.
1) do all humans only live in one of these days? If not, can I communicate with someone living in one of the other days?
2) since these days are simultaneous, does that mean that there are 4 simultaneous middays, midnights, etc?
3) If one faced (24 hour) time is evil and wrong, how can it be that 4 24 hour time is not? Would'nt the very concept of an hour be wrong also?
Now, about Timecube nomenclature...
4) Since God is nonexistant (as is religion)- how can things like mathematics, educators, etc, be considered to be "evil"? Wouldn't the revelation of the magnitude that the Timecube claims to be negate the very concept of good and evil?
5) What kinds of people are followers of the Timecube theory (cult, movement, whatever). I assume they are not academics- considering your hatred of academia. What do you do for a living?
Com'on fellas, we need to start teaching our children about thisTime Cube shit other wise we'll eat them.
http://www.abovegod.com/goya02.jpg
http://www.abovegod.com/
:(
http://www.sciencedaily.com/encyclopedia/time_cube
Quote:
Originally Posted by Science Daily
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
:link:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...id=13986&stc=1
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...id=13987&stc=1
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...id=13988&stc=1
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...id=13989&stc=1
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...id=13990&stc=1
If you can actually define something wouldnt you go so far as to say it exists?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
I mean, you have to have a basis for a definition, right? I can't define time travel vortex's, or men from Mars unless I can see them, study them,etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cubehead
See theres your problem - race doesnt matter - we're all part of the human species. Do spots on a dog matter or make it better? Genetic make-up determines what traits a person has not the color of their skin. Is every black person you meet smart? Is every white person you meet stupid? Can every asian person run faster than every Russian?
Eh... no, actually. I don't believe that God exists, but I'd say the Bible does a pretty thorough job of defining the concept.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Hell, unicorns don't exist but that doesn't mean we can't define what they are. They're horses with a horn sticking out of their forehead. Really, pretty much every single fictional construct ever still has a definition.
Being recognisable as something does not define its truth. That is merely speculation, it must be proved that it is what is claimed. That, is not a circle, even when I look at it, my eyes discern the seperate lines that make it up, thus making it merely a polygon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Dammit, Seth..............you're right......:sweat: ( I've broken the unspoken TNL rule too many times - admitting when I'm wrong)
Okay, well let me rephrase my reply to cubehead:
How do you debunk something just by lexical definition alone (which is basically a description of something)? Wouldnt you have to prove that it exists and give it certain scientific boundaries or something? I mean back in the day I had a friend who always lied and said he'd heard such and such was coming out for a certain game system " Dude, Killer Instinct 3 is coming out for Sega Saturn, I swear!" - I could debunk the fact that he was a lying piece of shit because A.) It never came out for Saturn,because Rare was owned by Nintendo and B.) The kid was a habitual lier and had lied about a lot of stuff before.Quote:
Originally Posted by cubehead
A.) and B.) are solid facts that make me disprove therefore debunk my lying friend - how do you debunk something that through science you cant prove does or does not exist?Maybe there are somethings that are just to complicated for Time Cube theory to handle. Can you explain why Charles Manson is a serial killer through Time Cube theory? Can Time Cube discern for you why absolute power corrupts absolutely,or can it explain the inner workings of a black hole? Can Time Cube explain to you why I love those little dimples on my girlfriends lower back? Can Time Cube explain to you why Mzo's mom is such a whore? I think not.
I doubt Time Cube is so god-like to be able to explain all aspects of life and give you answers to everything.
If it is - then tell me how many fingers I am holding up....right now....
I am not sure which "shape in the middle" you're referring to, but as I said, there is a harmonicity between the 4 right-angle quadrants originating at the centre, and the 4 right-angle corners of the square. That is a unique harmonicity; at least, no-one has yet been able to show any other such harmonicity. I conclude that the 4-corner-quadrant division is supreme.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Actually, if the precession has a period of 26000 years, then in 1 year, it would only move 1/26000th of its precession path; I imagine that this would be so small as to be negligible. Therefore, averaging out the axis tilt over one year gives a vertical axis, with only a small error.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
But the principle to which the averaging-out pertains has remained unchanged since I first described it; it is one of focusing solely on the axial rotation and associated day-night cycle, by averaging out all cycles that distort the measurement of the axial rotation. As I said, I think that in only one year, the precession-related movement would be negligible; but if not, we merely average it out, the same as we do with the seasons.
But where would you find a "true circle"? I don't think there can be one; anything appearing to be a circle is, like the figure I presented, quantised at the lowest level.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Try writing a recursive algorithm to perform the division task you presented, and run it on the computer; it will eventually experience a memory overflow and terminate. The computer can't handle infinity, and infinity itself is, by definition, immeasurable...
I see nothing wrong with my solution; that the universe is in fact quantised, and that any apparent continuum is actually quantised at the lowest level. Like the JudeoChristian WordGod, infinity is real only as a concept. There is no way to experience infinity, nor is there any way to prove it; Zeno was correct in that you can divide things into many parts, but to assume that there is no restrictive limit imposed thereon is, as I see it, illogical.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
The GameCube originated in the imaginations of some Japanese people, and lacks basis in the natural law, therefore fictitious.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Grandparent is the start of the final life-quadrant, in which the most ageing occurs. One reasons that while in the parent stage, adequate health must be maintained in order to competently provide for the children. Therefore, the majority of deteriorative ageing must be postponed until the children develop independence. Hence, the division of ageing into parent-grandparent and grandparent-death quadrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
In a stable community, some people will die young, others old, and it all averages out to 4. Grandparents can serve the purpose of providing experience and wisdom to the community.
Harmonic refers to multiple things with precise correlations between each other. So for instance, if you play a note on a musical instrument, the fourier analysis reveals harmonic frequencies; such frequencies, an octave apart, have the same waveform, dilated by a factor of 2. There is a precise correlation, a harmony, between them.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Read the articles on Cubic Awareness Online; I explain how the entire philosophy develops, based on the 4-division and the Principle of Opposites. That should make the Cubic philosophy fairly clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Well, I think you need to be more clear about exactly what circular logic, non-sequiturs, and ignored evidence of non-Cubic phenomena you are referring to.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
It is the underlying principle of the universe, and the principle governing our existence. In general, existing mathematical and scientific theories are limited in scope, and don't represent this principle in its entirety and its simplicity.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Animals don't require a comprehension of the overall principle, since they live more by their instincts and less by intelligence and religious brainwashing. But in human society, there is much Cubeless 1-corner Self-evil, that threatens to destroy humanity. There are two solutions to this predicament:
- Keep going with the evil, and bomb out.
- Change such that we are living by the Cubic principles, and are thereby enabled to evolve into Supermen.
Both will result in the return of Cubic harmony and stability, so it's up to us. Assuming that we truly want to survive and evolve into the future, then we must worship Time Cube and live by a pro-Cubic morality.
Yes, human individuals live in but 1 of the 4 days. If you telephone someone in a different corner, it does not cancel out the corners, as you are hearing merely an illusory replica of their voice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
The 4 middays are not at the same time, since the days are offset by 1/4 from each other. So, your midday is someone else's sunup, someone else's midnight and someone else's sundown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
It's true that an hour is a fictitious manmade division. The true natural division is that of the 4-corner-quadrants -- sunup, midday, sundown and midnight. So, in 1-earth rotation, there are 4 complete days, vis-a-vis, complete cycles through the 4-corner-quadrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
It is based on "good" as what aids the survival and evolution of humanity, and "evil" as what impedes, suppresses, and threatens to destroy it. Mathematics and Academic word-beliefs in general tend to be 1-corner cubeless. The conclusion that they are evil is based on the notion that if we believe the truth, we are more likely to be Good, and if we believe Cubeless lies, we are more likely to be Evil.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
Dr. Ray is a retired master electrician and inventor, and I am a university student.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
The definition exists, but not necessarily the thing it describes. You can prove this simply by defining two things that generate a paradox, whereby they could not possibly both exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The genes do determine the skin-colour, or at least the amount of melanin. There are traits other than the superficial appearance, but the differences in superficialities are indicative of the entire magnitude of interracial variation. Not every person of a given race is identical; rather, there are statistical distributions of the presence of different qualities across the population, and different races have different distributions for different traits.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Well then, how do you prove that there's such a thing as a true circle? You can discern the quanta that form the image I presented, but if they were a lot smaller, they would become indistinguishable and you would perceive it as a continuum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
If you had to prove that something is existent/true before debunking it, you would have had to prove that Killer Instinct 3 did come out for Sega Saturn before debunking it. But the fact is that you merely have to define it, and then show that it could not possibly be existent/true -- so, "A." above is a fact that precludes the event, as defined, from occurring in reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Bear in mind that "B.", combined with incredulity of the hypothesis, cannot be used to actually disprove it; rather, it can show that it is improbable, and thus allow you to make a fairly accurate assumption about its veracity, in lieu of actual evidence required for proof.
I think it is more a case of it being too complicated for us to evaluate it; scientists can come up with accurate models of air flow and other weather patterns, but to actually predict weather very accurately would require large amounts of data collection and a hell of a lot of computer power. Time Cube combines with chaos to evolve very complex phenomena; we may not be able to understand all the details of how these phenomena operate, but we can understand the basic Cubic principles governing them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Since these questions are of a general nature and pertain not to specificities that would be very difficult to evaluate without empirical observation, they can be answered through knowledge of Time Cube. The absolute power for the 1-corner individual corrupts and bombs out because for Cubic harmony, the individual must exist as part of the 4-corner Village-Cube-unity. The power can only be sustained if the possessor is driven towards the bestowing virtue and bestows and distributes the power amongst the community.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The inner workings of a black hole amount to a Cubic cycle: for true cyclicality, everything that goes into the black hole must eventually come out again. It would be a lot more complicated to determine technical details of how it works, but certainly eternal recurrence is a proven fact.
I am not sure which "shape in the middle" you're referring to, but as I said, there is a harmonicity between the 4 right-angle quadrants originating at the centre, and the 4 right-angle corners of the square. That is a unique harmonicity; at least, no-one has yet been able to show any other such harmonicity. I conclude that the 4-corner-quadrant division is supreme.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Actually, if the precession has a period of 26000 years, then in 1 year, it would only move 1/26000th of its precession path; I imagine that this would be so small as to be negligible. Therefore, averaging out the axis tilt over one year gives a vertical axis, with only a small error.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
But the principle to which the averaging-out pertains has remained unchanged since I first described it; it is one of focusing solely on the axial rotation and associated day-night cycle, by averaging out all cycles that distort the measurement of the axial rotation. As I said, I think that in only one year, the precession-related movement would be negligible; but if not, we merely average it out, the same as we do with the seasons.
But where would you find a "true circle"? I don't think there can be one; anything appearing to be a circle is, like the figure I presented, quantised at the lowest level.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Try writing a recursive algorithm to perform the division task you presented, and run it on the computer; it will eventually experience a memory overflow and terminate. The computer can't handle infinity, and infinity itself is, by definition, immeasurable...
I see nothing wrong with my solution; that the universe is in fact quantised, and that any apparent continuum is actually quantised at the lowest level. Like the JudeoChristian WordGod, infinity is real only as a concept. There is no way to experience infinity, nor is there any way to prove it; Zeno was correct in that you can divide things into many parts, but to assume that there is no restrictive limit imposed thereon is, as I see it, illogical.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
The GameCube originated in the imaginations of some Japanese people, and lacks basis in the natural law, therefore fictitious.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Grandparent is the start of the final life-quadrant, in which the most ageing occurs. One reasons that while in the parent stage, adequate health must be maintained in order to competently provide for the children. Therefore, the majority of deteriorative ageing must be postponed until the children develop independence. Hence, the division of ageing into parent-grandparent and grandparent-death quadrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
In a stable community, some people will die young, others old, and it all averages out to 4. Grandparents can serve the purpose of providing experience and wisdom to the community.
Harmonic refers to multiple things with precise correlations between each other. So for instance, if you play a note on a musical instrument, the fourier analysis reveals harmonic frequencies; such frequencies, an octave apart, have the same waveform, dilated by a factor of 2. There is a precise correlation, a harmony, between them.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Read the articles on Cubic Awareness Online; I explain how the entire philosophy develops, based on the 4-division and the Principle of Opposites. That should make the Cubic philosophy fairly clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Well, I think you need to be more clear about exactly what circular logic, non-sequiturs, and ignored evidence of non-Cubic phenomena you are referring to.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
It is the underlying principle of the universe, and the principle governing our existence. In general, existing mathematical and scientific theories are limited in scope, and don't represent this principle in its entirety and its simplicity.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Animals don't require a comprehension of the overall principle, since they live more by their instincts and less by intelligence and religious brainwashing. But in human society, there is much Cubeless 1-corner Self-evil, that threatens to destroy humanity. There are two solutions to this predicament:
- Keep going with the evil, and bomb out.
- Change such that we are living by the Cubic principles, and are thereby enabled to evolve into Supermen.
Both will result in the return of Cubic harmony and stability, so it's up to us. Assuming that we truly want to survive and evolve into the future, then we must worship Time Cube and live by a pro-Cubic morality.
Yes, human individuals live in but 1 of the 4 days. If you telephone someone in a different corner, it does not cancel out the corners, as you are hearing merely an illusory replica of their voice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
The 4 middays are not at the same time, since the days are offset by 1/4 from each other. So, your midday is someone else's sunup, someone else's midnight and someone else's sundown.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
It's true that an hour is a fictitious manmade division. The true natural division is that of the 4-corner-quadrants -- sunup, midday, sundown and midnight. So, in 1-earth rotation, there are 4 complete days, vis-a-vis, complete cycles through the 4-corner-quadrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
It is based on "good" as what aids the survival and evolution of humanity, and "evil" as what impedes, suppresses, and threatens to destroy it. Mathematics and Academic word-beliefs in general tend to be 1-corner cubeless. The conclusion that they are evil is based on the notion that if we believe the truth, we are more likely to be Good, and if we believe Cubeless lies, we are more likely to be Evil.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
Dr. Ray is a retired master electrician and inventor, and I am a university student.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
The definition exists, but not necessarily the thing it describes. You can prove this simply by defining two things that generate a paradox, whereby they could not possibly both exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The genes do determine the skin-colour, or at least the amount of melanin. There are traits other than the superficial appearance, but the differences in superficialities are indicative of the entire magnitude of interracial variation. Not every person of a given race is identical; rather, there are statistical distributions of the presence of different qualities across the population, and different races have different distributions for different traits.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Well then, how do you prove that there's such a thing as a true circle? You can discern the quanta that form the image I presented, but if they were a lot smaller, they would become indistinguishable and you would perceive it as a continuum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
If you had to prove that something is existent/true before debunking it, you would have had to prove that Killer Instinct 3 did come out for Sega Saturn before debunking it. But the fact is that you merely have to define it, and then show that it could not possibly be existent/true -- so, "A." above is a fact that precludes the event, as defined, from occurring in reality.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Bear in mind that "B.", combined with incredulity of the hypothesis, cannot be used to actually disprove it; rather, it can show that it is improbable, and thus allow you to make a fairly accurate assumption about its veracity, in lieu of actual evidence required for proof.
I think it is more a case of it being too complicated for us to evaluate it; scientists can come up with accurate models of air flow and other weather patterns, but to actually predict weather very accurately would require large amounts of data collection and a hell of a lot of computer power. Time Cube combines with chaos to evolve very complex phenomena; we may not be able to understand all the details of how these phenomena operate, but we can understand the basic Cubic principles governing them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
Since these questions are of a general nature and pertain not to specificities that would be very difficult to evaluate without empirical observation, they can be answered through knowledge of Time Cube. The absolute power for the 1-corner individual corrupts and bombs out because for Cubic harmony, the individual must exist as part of the 4-corner Village-Cube-unity. The power can only be sustained if the possessor is driven towards the bestowing virtue and bestows and distributes the power amongst the community.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
The inner workings of a black hole amount to a Cubic cycle: for true cyclicality, everything that goes into the black hole must eventually come out again. It would be a lot more complicated to determine technical details of how it works, but certainly eternal recurrence is a proven fact.
A perfect circle cannot exist in nature, the only way a perfect circle can even be competantly theorized is with the acceptance of infinitely small building blocks. Otherwise, it will always remain a polygon or rough surfaced object.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubicao
Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
The computer can't infinitely divide because it doesn't have an infinite amount of RAM, being unable to computer infinity doesn't refute its existance, that's the whole point of the Zeno paradox solutions. The paradox only exists in a hole in human logic.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
It's only illogical because you can't grasp infinity, because I suspect that not only are you in some way mentally disturbed but you're also a moron. That or you're a troll that tries way too hard. A universe that is not infinitesimally divisible would mean that on some minute scale things would take "steps", now that's illogical, and easily misproven hypothetically.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
For all these hypothetical tests, a photon can only move in 1 mm steps in 3 dimensions, they also all move at the same speed of one mm per second (I know that's big steps and slow photons, but it's hypothetical so STFU).
Let's try a cubic matrix first, Photon one moves along the axis of the matrix, photon two is moving diagonally across to the opposing corner of the cube, photon one takes three steps "up", photon two must move one step "up", one step "in" and one step "right" to move diagonally. Fig 1.
This would mean that things going along the "grain" would move a longer distance in the same time than things moving diagionally, this would effect things even on a macro scale; and therefore obvious that this is not the case. The only solution is diagonal things to move faster to catch up, which would only break a handfull of fundamental physical rules. A cubic or diamond matrix (quadrilaterals) are the only possible configurations that would tessellate and provide every point with identical connections (you cant tell one point from another, the center point of one cube is the edge of another and so on so on), it really doesn't matter however you construct your matrix, it will still limit movement in some way.
Okay, so let's ditch the matrix, this time things can move in any direction within 3D space but only in 1mm steps. See Fig 2.
This way ends up with photons filling space between other photons steps, essentially producing an infinite amount of divisions. Not to mention that the fact the photon can move in any infinite amount of directions... since anything else, as the matrix thing proves would require inequal amounts of energy to move in different directions.
http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/a...chmentid=14005
This is seriously my last response, it's gone well beyond not being fun fucking around with you. You need to get help, nutcase or troll.
I may be the educated stupid, but you're just plain stupid.
Cubehead - I'm very interested in this...
How is Time Cube organized? Is it like a Masonic Lodge? Are there local chapters? Where does one go to discuss Time Cube? Can you talk about Time Cube? If someone yells "stop" or goes limp, do you tap out and the discussion's over? Are there only two guys to a discussion? Is there only one discussion at a time?
Do you wear shirts? Shoes?
Will discussions go on as long as they have to?
If it is your first night at Time Cube, do you have to Cube?
No, because we have no infinitely small building blocks, yet we can still represent circles. Simply create the equation for the circle (no infinity required for the equation) and then plot a graph of it using quite small building-blocks, eg. pixels, and it will come out as a smooth circle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Destin
Infinity's existence is refuted by its being unobservable, and by the universe being explainable without resorting to infinity. The solution to the paradox is a quantised, non-infinite universe. I think that you may hold nihilist beliefs, and are therefore arguing in favour of infinity.Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Aha, but if you add in some oscillation, like so:Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
http://img208.exs.cx/img208/688/stepsmatrix2yb.gif
Given the transverse oscillation of the vertical A-B path in the above 2D figure, it has the same number of steps as the diagonal A-C path, which itself already has an h-v-h-v oscillation. The same is applicable to the 3D matrix. This provides an explanation of the transverse wave behaviour of photons, and resolves the issue of quantised paths.
It's not a cult if that's what you're thinking. The idea is that many people gain Cubic awareness, and then we take action to overthrow governments and create anarchy and live in small communities, in harmony with Nature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces & Eights
Are you a Taoist?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces & Eights
BAHAHA
What the fuck does that have to do with a 96 hour day?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Hm. Wait, if there's no infinity, and the universe ends somewhere, then what's beyond there? is it just nothing? and if so, does the nothing go on for infinity? but it can't because infinity is impossible, according to TimeCube. so then it has to end. but what's past there? more nothing?
also, what is the meaning of life?
Asking what exists beyond existence is like asking what's north of the north pole. It's a meaningless question, similar to "what happened before the beginning of time?" I'd argue that since "before" is a time-sensitive concept, there's no possible way to answer that question.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarkex
It's hard to grasp, but that doesn't mean it isn't the case. Most scientists these days agree that the universe is finite, and space and time along with it.
My penis is a cube!
I think Cubehead is among the craziest on the internet, define that with the cubic theory.
That post doesn't make any sense.
Cubehead > you.
I agree with Gohron. Cubehead has to start thinking outside the box.
Neither do his posts, explaining why mine didn't either.
His posts make sense. They're just completely false.
There may be some overlap between the eastern religions and Cubicism. To the extent that they are worshipping Nature and not a fictitious 1-corner WordGod, they may be more Cubic-compliant. However, if they have pacifist views and have views precluding them from following the evolved natural law, eg. not eating any animals, then that would constitute nihilism that will tend to extinguish them.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
Living in harmony with Nature, as opposed to being enslaved by the WordVirus, is because Nature tends to evolve features that aid survival and further evolution -- since these, of course, are evolutionary advantages -- hence, the Will to Power. But like biological virii, the WordVirus has no sexual reproduction to facilitate implicit cubic selection. It relies, primarily, on random mutations -- this gives it less of a chance of survival than the natural law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
Now, over time, it could develop means of ensuring its continued survival and perpetuation -- but the problem is that in the modern era, it is evolving and changing so rapidly that it could bomb out before Time Cube has a chance to judge it, and before we have the chance to learn from its shortcomings and modify it accordingly. So, given this, and the fact that it has less chance of survival than natural law, it is unfavourable to let ourselves be enslaved by it.
Chaos and Time Cube coexist, and facilitate evolution. As I said, the WordVirus relies primarily on random mutations, so it is more a product of Chaos than an accurate representation of Cubic principles. But, as shown in Cubiform and Pyramidal Life-forms and in Cycles, Systems and Complexities in Nature, Nature clearly has properties related to the Cube representation and the 4/16 rotation principle. The 4 simultaneous days are derived from the 4/16 rotation principle, so that's how they are related to taming the WordVirus and adopt a more natural lifestyle.
The solution is that there are finite states of existence, and that if you go out in a spaceship, eventually you'll just keep cycling through the finite set of states of existence. It's like if you roll a die -- you just keep going through the finite set of six possible outcomes. Space folds back on itself, as does Time. I have explained this principle in The Rational Belief, so check it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarkex
For the individual, it is to exercise your evolved instincts, emotions, and intelligence, thus facilitating the perpetuation and evolution of the community of which you're a part, as Nature intended. For the community, and for Nature as a whole, it's evolution -- using Chaos as leverage to change such that it satisfies the Cubic principles in increasingly sophisticated ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anarkex
Exactly, it's a paradox; and I believe that it originates mostly from the bastardly-queer 1-corner self-perspective. You as a self were born at a point in time, and so you may falsely apply this perspective to the universe, assuming that it also came into existence at a point in time. To ask "what was before the beginning" is like asking "what was before I was born" -- the answer is that you, and your beginning, are part of an eternal cycle.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
However, you're not being helpful unless you actually give some good reasons why my arguments should be considered false.Quote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
Main Entry: cube
Pronunciation: 'kyüb
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin cubus, from Greek kybos die, cube
1 a : the regular solid of six equal square sides -- see VOLUME table b : something shaped like a cube <ice cube>
Shouldn't you be Squarehead?
The fact that science has done so much without your stupid theories is proof enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildkat
........................... I hope you're happy. You just single-handedly sent the hope of a peaceful Cubic future down in smoldering flames.
No, because you have ignored the important property of Time Cube that I have previously described -- the property of ROTATION. The Cube rotates about an axis passing through the centre of one face, and the centre of the opposite face. Those two faces are the top and bottom; the other 4 are the 4 sides, and the 4 vertical edges where the sides meet are the 4 corners. Also, the rotation causes dilation/squashing along the rotational axis. See Cube Representation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildkat
But what about the potential for it to do more? And there is also the issue of how much its achievements will amount to in the long-term -- as explained in Cubeless Doom, it seems likely that the WordVirus' pyramiding will destroy humanity within several generations. We need to engage in Cubic evaluation, to gain a better awareness of Time Cube's already established transcendence of the existing Academian science.Quote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
I'm happy, because all he did was bring up a common misconception about Time Cube, one easily addressed. The future will be peaceful in that it will be stable, without the buildup of unstable equilibrium such as nuclear weapon proliferation. It's like charge buildup in storm-clouds -- in the absence of conductivity (conflict), you get a "cold war" with charge accumulating until a massive lighting discharge (nuclear armageddon) occurs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetman
We see that conflict is indeed a good thing, to avoid instability; but the conflict inherent to Cubic harmony occurs on a smaller scale, between the small communities, and without the use of evil modern technology that threatens to enslave humanity.
Seriously, just ignore Cubehead, his ignorance is infinite and so is his trolling ability.
I think he's swell :) :tu:
It's a pity that you cannot give rational justification for your nihilist infinity-beliefs, nor state exactly what you allege I am ignorant of. By saying "ignore Cubehead", you seem to actually be encouraging ignorance of Time Cube. I believe that I am encouraging rational thought rather than trolling; can you think rationally about your infinity-beliefs, and either support them with arguments and refute my counter-arguments, or acknowledge that they are false?Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
Have you ever considered that saying things like "bastardly-queer" and "WordGod" and other such banal and hilarious phrases are one of the HUGE reasons why nobody is taking you seriously? I don't care what your reasoning is, it makes you sound like a psychotic fanatic rather than someone who's trying to make a legitimate point. Cut out the bullshit "evil 1-point word-idol" crap and just make your points.
I'm sorry for posting an insincere flame out of boredom, but not for ceasing to respond to your bullshit "rational justifications". For fucks sake, you didn't even keep the wavelengths and amplitude of the two photons consistent. Currently, I've already posted two posts more than I should of.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
What do you mean, those are some of the best insults I've heard in years.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Although I agree, I imagine most people would have trouble taking a scientific theory seriously if the person who discovered it presented it in a lecture which featured liberal use of the words "fucknut" and "asshat."
My friend got multiple curse words and circled and commented on in his college paper.
Sometimes you just gotta let it out.
What a nutjob.
Also, I have never heard of the Time Cube retard before, but there is a far more elaborate one I (thankfully) forgot the URL for. It was for the Philadelphia Project. You know, the supposed WWII ship that could cloak itself, even the History Channel did a story on it, it was nothing but simple a degaussing method which they thought would help the ship avoid radar better. But this one guy has a website devoted to the project where he says he went back in a time machine, people on the ship melted because of the "cloaking" spazzing out (wow, I wonder if he ever saw that one episode of Star Trek TNG about Riker's old experimental ship :rolleyes: ), met alternate members of the crew who came to the present and had kids then had to go back, and one of their team members was turned into a sasquatch somehow. :lol: He has tapes and videos you can buy and says he does lectures. Lectures! Can you imagine listening to a lecture by this maniac? Man, I would love to MST one of his speeches.
Tell it to yawa, I think he *guaranteed* that that story is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh_H
Either way, it's interesting.
Uh, who's yawa?Quote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
I ran into the site about 6 months ago. I had seen that History Channel thing on it that you mentioned, and it kind of interested me, so I did a Google Search. Anyway, this was one of the first sites I ran into and it kind of trailed off from the Philadelphia Project and went into more bizarre things(like invisible government agents who shrink themselves and record your thoughts). The old gu who ran the site was an obvious nut who stepped on one too many landmines, ya know?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh_H
Uh, who's yawa? Are you telling me someone here claims to have tried the time cube...thing? hahaQuote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
Haha. Yeah, it's guys like that who make me feel just fine for being a single 25 year old gamer. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Swift
I wonder though....could the Time Cube have anything to do with the final boss form in Giga Wing which is a little cube?! :blank:
However, I think that those phrases are justified in terms of the rational Cubic proof: bastardly-queer, because God doesn't exist within a family (bastard) and can't have children with a female god (queer); and WordGod, because the JudeoChristian God is essentially a belief transmitted by Words, as evidenced by the forbidding of graven images, and composed of words, as evidenced even by the Bible: "In the beginning was Word, and the Word was with God, and the word was God." See Religion.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
But it should be quite simple to equate the properties of the diagonal to the vertical, simply by making it something like this:Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroBlue
http://img214.exs.cx/img214/1082/stepsmodify0te.gif
:lol: I totally picture you making this stuff up on the spot. Which is cool, because it makes it that much funnier.
Kudos for actually coming up with explanations for those words. :tu:
A for effort, I guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Incidentally, queers can have kids (they're not sterile, you know) and bastards still have families. You don't even seem to know what the words mean. MAYBE "orphan-sterile" but I guess that doesn't sound catchy enough.
And no, even if the words make sense in your own reasoning, it's still hurting your case to use them. Fucknut.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/index.p...gis-gayday.mp3
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/index.p...-gayschool.mp3
Only because you mentioned queers.
See, if I didn't know that was fake it'd become obvious the second he says "we're not queers" because every self-righteous gay guy I know embraces that word like nothing else. It's obnoxious as fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
http://www.qwantz.com/comics/comic2-514.png
I just had to share this somewhere...
He's possibly the stupidest redneck on Earth.
You're expecting far too much.
I was talking about the Philadelphia Experiment thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh_H
The point is that the queer sexuality precludes them from having sex with a member of the opposite sex. Like the 1-corner Self-God, a bastard does not have a proper family structure. To have but 1 god would equate to Singularity, which is like sex with the baby; there must be a variegated pantheon of self-idols representing the multitude of different Supermen whom, we envisage, will begin to populate the earth following Cubic revolution.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
The group of identity operations of a square is not isomorphic to the identity operations of a circle, or of any n-gon greater than 4 (the order of individual elements is different, which is very applicable to what shit is spouted on that page). Which means that, basically, their construct is not the same, and you will lose information when you transfer from one to the other.
So where does this idea of "harmony" come into play? I want to see a rigorous, mathematical definition, complete with all necessary proofs to build the framework of it. Because this is the definition of harmonics.
If you tell me Im full of shit because all of current mathematics is wrong, I want you to disprove it, rigorously, and not by using bullshit talk about harmonics (again, no proof) and 1god nonsense. Lets be real here. Show this mathematician whats up.
But once you provide me this information, then I can start to believe the time cube theory.
http://www.geocities.com/cubicprophe.../4supreme.html
The point is that it's a stupid word no matter how accurate it might be and it undermines everything you're trying to do. Self-God, bastard-queer, these are all very, very stupid phrases that, at the VERY least, could be expressed in a more eloquent and intelligent manner. It's the difference between "sir, I do believe you're mistaken" and "HAHA YOU'RE WRONG! YOU'RE SUCH A DUMMY DUMDUMHEAD!" They might mean the same thing, but only one will result in being taken seriously. If you can't see how using phrases like this is doing nothing but hurting your cause, then I don't know what to tell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
This is seriously doctorate level Internet arguing, I hardly feel qualified to read this thread. But from what I've gathered, timecubers believe in a different world view based on cubes, and will defend it in a new and exciting manner of hypenated insults.
Quiet orginal work, most people use repeatable, documented research and math, aparently all of humanity's scientific method and knowledge derived from it are wrong adn we're just educated evil.
All hail the new methods of knowledge, all hail the hypenated insult!
My favorite thing about timecube (which doesn't even deserve to be capitalized) is how this so-called "theory of everything" actually claims an ultimate morality in the universe. And that whole "destroy government, create anarchy and live in harmony with nature" is just great.
I wonder if Cosmic String Theory has some moral provision about overthrowing governments and killing gay people?
For the love of god, just let it die already. It was fun at first, but do you people really about care what this basket case has to say?
I refuse, too much to be had watching this interweb "discussion" go one with you hyphenated whatevers.
The circle encompasses 360 degrees around its centre point, right? So we divide it into 4 right-angle quadrants. We then draw a square around it. The square represents its finite limits, and can be related back to the circle in that when it rotates once (as in the 4/16 rotation principle), the area always within it forms an inscribed circle.Quote:
Originally Posted by diffusionx
The harmonicity exists in the correlation between the 4 right-angle quadrants, and the 4 right-angle corners of the square. A harmony between two waveforms is a correlation between them; the 4-corner-quadrant harmony entails a similar correlation. And it is a unique harmony; no other quadrilateral could represent the perfectly even division of quadrants, and no polygon other than the quadrilateral can match its angles with the division of the circle. This uniqueness proves the supremacy of 4.
My view is that they are not excessively vulgar or belligerent, and can be used in moderation provided that they are not supplanting the reasoned arguments.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
Empirical observations performed with Academia's scientific method are usually OK; the problem is that the theoretical constructs with which scientists interpret them are based on a 1-corner Cubeless world-view. I am among those using verifiable observations and reasoning; for instance, it's easy to observe Earth's rotational properties, and on the 4/16 rotation principle page I detail the logical principle used to prove 4 simultaneous days within a single earth rotation.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarsKitten
It's a meta-morality; assuming we want humanity to survive and perpetuate into the future, then we must maximise Good, which is what creates a survival and/or evolutionary advantage, and Evil, which is the antithesis. Of course, it could be that we want humanity to bomb out, in which case we would take the evil path. Either way, the current evil will diminish, creating Cubic harmony; Time Cube is indifferent to which one occurs, so it's up to us to exercise our existentialist free-will and make that choice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerodash
I have argued that anarchy would be more Good than continuing with techno-governments; it may be that you have reasons to think otherwise, in which case you should state them. I never said that we should kill gay people; as far as I'm concerned, homosexuality is something that occurs naturally, and it should not be seen as a problem in and of itself, but rather, as a possible symptom of a greater problem, such as overpopulation.
Do you have nihilist beliefs, by any chance? When you say "just let it die already", that is a statement typical of one who wants to cease the evolutionary struggle towards the Superman, and become a last-man instead. Relating it to the "love of god" may imply that you are espousing this nihilism in connection with nihilist religious beliefs, such as Christianity -- in which all negative emotions, which drive one to improve one's situation, are abandoned, thus leaving only love and whatever small power one may currently possess, and drastically reducing the evolution-facilitating Will to Power. To deny passion -- "do you people really about care" -- is another nihilistic tendency. Haven't you ever thought that man is something that is to be surpassed, and that you yourself could perhaps do something to surpass him?Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
you smoke a lot of pot, don't you?
This guy's on something stronger than weed, belive me.
And the view of everyone who's listening to you (you know, the people you're trying to convince) is that they're ridiculous non-words.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
Good point everybody, I'm very interested in what drugs Cubehead has taken.
Do tell.
I take no drugs, but metaphorically speaking, my Cubic enlightenment has more to do with ceasing to take drugs -- for only by renouncing and separating oneself from the fictitious WordWorldMatrix -- which, like drugs, is an addictive source of false happiness -- will one be sobered and consequently driven to seek the ineffable Cubic Truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by OmniGear
BORING!
STOP IT. THIS IS NOT A WORD.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
:lol: Flamble!
You'd think that the rest of his ramblings would irritate me, but nope... it's just his butchering of the english language.
Or should I say, You-man would mind-thought that his word-rambles would irritate the me-self, but nope, it's just his destruction-mind-thoughts toward the english man-speak.
I take it back. Keep 'em comin'.Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
LOL.Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
...Wait, not only are there three switched thoughts in that sentence, but neither of the last two directly flow off the first part. That only leaves the second part in which case there should be no break.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubehead
BUT THAT MEANS THERE'S FOUR PARTS TO THE SENTENCE! ASTOUNDING!
p.s. Sethsez continues to be one of my favorite posters.
Actually it is a fusion of several words, creating an exciting new meaning. The Matrix represents the enslavement of human's minds through brainwashing with cultural memes -- since this fictitious world is communicated primarily through words, it is a WordWorld. And due to its relation to the Matrix, it is as a WordWorldMatrix. As Dr Ray, the greatest genius the world has ever known, so aptly said:Quote:
Originally Posted by sethsez
"Did you see the movie Matrix? Actually the induced night "dream world" is synonymous with the academic religious induced daytime "word world" enslavement of humans. Word has no inherent value, as it was invented as a counterfeit and fictitious value to represent natural values in commerce. Unfortunately, human values have declined to fictitious word values. Unknowingly, you are living in a "Word World", as in a fictitious life in a counterfeit nation - which you could consider Matrix induced "Dream World". Can you distinguish the academic induced "Word World" from the natural "Real World"? Beware of the change when your brain is free from induced "Word World" enslavement - for you could find that the natural "Real World" has been destroyed."
...All-I-GotOut-ofThat isthat-you're trying to-escape TheEvil-WordWorld-by creating-new words.
You're crazynuts.