Analyzing Data 100%
What, did you forget what topic you're in?Originally posted by JMET
And this has what to do with what?
Well, of course it's all subjective, but given the PSX was technically superior, I don't see how it wouldn't have looked better, unless Sonic Team just made it look like ass on purpose. Honestly, if you haven't played Nights in a while, I urge you to go back and take another look; it's not nearly as pretty as nostalgia makes you remember.And to answer your question I would think no...
Too Cool for Top 10 Lists
The game's colors are still bright, and the character models aren't bad. I still consider it to be a great game, graphically. Seeing a PS2 sequel would be great, since it would probably be a great game, and would be able to reach a much larger audience.
matthewgood fan
lupin III fan
Analyzing Data 100%
Well I tend to agree, I mean just a few days ago I was talking to a friend (hayato42) about how amazed I was that PS2 was still pumping out graphics like Sly Cooper and Ratchet and Clank, but GC and XB are still definitely more powerful, that's my whole point, the more power the more you can do. Not that I still won't be first in line for this with you guys.Originally posted by FirstBlood
and yes, it would have looked a lot better on the PSX, but i don't think the difference in PS2/XBox is as big as PSX/Saturn
Too Cool for Top 10 Lists
Wow, it's amazing that the PS2's graphics don't look like shit now. I mean damn, the system's been out a whole two years. Put your foot a little bit further in your mouth there, Andy.
matthewgood fan
lupin III fan
Analyzing Data 100%
Hostages? **** em'
Originally posted by Andy
What the fuck are you talking about, Sir Spammingham of Shitpostington?... let me guess, jeremy just posted...
*hugs ignore feature*
Analyzing Data 100%
I am not so sure. Some of Sega's internal teams got the Saturn to sing. The problem was that very few of the 3rd parties could do the same. This is very similar to the current PS2 situation. Take a look at Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2 on PS2. It is a gorgeous racing game. The problem is that not all developers have the resources that EA does to dig into the hardware and max it out. It's truly not a matter of raw power. It's a matter of decoding the architecture. I have complete faith that Sonic Team has both the talent and the attention to detail to accomplish that on the PS2.Originally posted by Andy
Would Nights have not looked much better on the PSX?
poop
I agree and that is what I was saying without saying it..Originally posted by Yoshi
I am not so sure. Some of Sega's internal teams got the Saturn to sing. The problem was that very few of the 3rd parties could do the same. This is very similar to the current PS2 situation. Take a look at Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2 on PS2. It is a gorgeous racing game. The problem is that not all developers have the resources that EA does to dig into the hardware and max it out. It's truly not a matter of raw power. It's a matter of decoding the architecture. I have complete faith that Sonic Team has both the talent and the attention to detail to accomplish that on the PS2.
Load"*",8,1
Originally posted by Andy
What, did you forget what topic you're in?
Well, of course it's all subjective, but given the PSX was technically superior, I don't see how it wouldn't have looked better, unless Sonic Team just made it look like ass on purpose. Honestly, if you haven't played Nights in a while, I urge you to go back and take another look; it's not nearly as pretty as nostalgia makes you remember.
That's a matter of opinion. I think Sega Rally, Virtual Fighter 2, and Panzer Dragoon Zwie, were some of the better looking games of the 32/64 bit consoles. Don't tell me Gran Tourismo looked better than Sega Rally 95, or I'll fall out of this chair laughing!
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks