Famitsu is supposed to be a respectable mag...I dunno. I couldn't give a shit about FFX-2, however.
http://www.gamesarefun.com/cgi-bin/n...6867386,33794,
34/40 by famitsu.... I have no idea how reliable they are.
Famitsu is supposed to be a respectable mag...I dunno. I couldn't give a shit about FFX-2, however.
Dolemite, the Bad-Ass King of all Pimps and Hustlers
Gymkata: I mean look at da lil playah woblin his way into our hearts in the sig awwwwwww
Famitsu was the gaming mag of record for most of the 90s, although they had a penchant for kissing Nintendo's ass. I mean EGM ripped them off in terms of style and content along with many other mags. They are still very respectable though. I'm more interested in thouse VF4 Evo scores! 9, 10, 9 , 9.
famitsu i don't consider reliable for predicting my tastes. sometimes we agree, sometimes not at all.
GAF isn't reliable. =)
still, i don't care what FFX-2 gets from anywhere, i'm sure to want to play it myself and find out for myself. i'd like to see the text of the reviews much more than the score, although the text in famitsu is pretty much a joke.
They are considered by many to be the GamePro of Japan, so take that as you will. I don't keep up with their scores and can't read their reviews so I can't say how good they are.Originally posted by xS
I have no idea how reliable they are.
The original FFX got 39/40.... take that as you will. I've yet to play FFX, I'll probably play it alongside X-2. I hope that it's nothing like 8( the art in X is definetely worse).
Well, if we adjust my feelings for FFX to Famitsu's and go on that they liked FFX-2 less then FFX... well, I think people here know what I place that. On the bright side, it's probably better then Mystic Quest.Originally posted by xS
The original FFX got 39/40.... take that as you will.
In the words of a sarcastic Selphie (okay, I confess: I really was just looking for an excuse to post this):
Hmm...34 isn't bad...
November is a long way off![]()
So then what's a reliable source for game ratings?![]()
Bookmarks