Famitsu is Square's bitch. They gave The Bouncer really good scores.
What baffles me about USaga is that Famitsu gave it a Silver award... I mean, I've had my doubts about Famitsu's critical acumen for a while, but giving this game such high scores is insane. Japanese gamers didn't seem to enthralled with it either, as I spied tons of copies for around $15 just a few months after release in shops there.
shane_
Famitsu is Square's bitch. They gave The Bouncer really good scores.
As much as I'd like to be surprised by this score, I can't be. It's a well known fact that Square is a one trick pony. Aside from the few gems like Secret of Mana and Chrono Trigger during the SNES days and more recently, Kingdom Hearts, nothing they've done outside of the Fantasy franchise has been worth noticing unless it is phoenomonally(sp?) bad like the Bouncer.Originally posted by xS
Unlimited Saga 2.0 4.0 4.0
Youre an idiot. Unless, of course, you are saying that their one trick pony is "RPGs". Of course, youre not.Originally posted by Master of 7s
As much as I'd like to be surprised by this score, I can't be. It's a well known fact that Square is a one trick pony. Aside from the few gems like Secret of Mana and Chrono Trigger during the SNES days and more recently, Kingdom Hearts, nothing they've done outside of the Fantasy franchise has been worth noticing unless it is phoenomonally(sp?) bad like the Bouncer.
Have you ever heard of Einhander?
Have you ever heard of Bushido Blade (not 2)?
Have you ever heard of Vagrant Story?
Have you ever heard of Chrono Cross?
Have you ever heard of Front Mission?
Have you ever heard of Tobal 2?
Have you ever heard of Xenogears?
I dunno, maybe you should check them out. Word on the street is that a lot of people really enjoyed them.
They're not a one-trick pony.
Brave Fencer Musashi anyone?
Romancing wasn't all that bad though and SaGa Frontier 2 wasn't without it's problems it remains a good play.Originally posted by xS
The SaGa series has always sucked.
Square didn't make the Bouncer anyway. As much as I'd like to bash them, it's unfair to give them a bad rep for a game that they only published.
For PSO, it's lacking one essential element that all the Phantasy Stars had, that is a story. The gameflow of the PS series for me at least has always been moving from plot point to plot point while doing a little leveling up along the way. Removing the story changes the flow of the game completely, so much so that I really don't see it as part of the same series, but more of a spin off like those gun suvivor games are to the RE series.
"I've watched while the maggots have defiled the earth. They have
built their castles and had their wars. I cannot stand by idly any longer." - Otogi 2
Pretty much. They've threatened to pull ads from Famitsu if any of their games scores anything less-than-average.Originally posted by Saint of Killers
Famitsu is Square's bitch. They gave The Bouncer really good scores.
Thank you.Originally posted by diffusionx
Youre an idiot. Unless, of course, you are saying that their one trick pony is "RPGs". Of course, youre not.
Have you ever heard of Einhander?
Have you ever heard of Bushido Blade (not 2)?
Have you ever heard of Vagrant Story?
Have you ever heard of Chrono Cross?
Have you ever heard of Front Mission?
Have you ever heard of Tobal 2?
Have you ever heard of Xenogears?
I dunno, maybe you should check them out. Word on the street is that a lot of people really enjoyed them.
They're not a one-trick pony.
Well that's like, your opinion, man.
Phantasy Star Online:Episodes 1 and 2 9.0 9.0 9.0 GOTM
Does anyone else find it ridiculous that this rates so much higher than any other version ever?
Are there more additions than the characters and voice support that I just didn't hear about?
If not those must be some characters.
Originally Posted by William Oldham
Bookmarks