i'd take a nice firm medium or even small over a set like that
Whats all the dissen on the natural big boobs? Sagging? you care about that? That's just insane. Real large boobs rule, and the girls who have them rule even more. There should be a government body that seeks said girls out and showers them with gifts for being so wonderful. sagging? blah, blaspheme, turn in your nuts please, you are no longer male.
Oh, and please no crap about "but when they get old", when they get old, they are going to be ugly. That goes for all females, hell, all humans. When the two of you are old, she is going to be ugly, and you are going to be ugly. Deal with it.
Most guys who openly complain about large chested girls, eventually turn gay, or at least in my experence.
i'd take a nice firm medium or even small over a set like that
a small or medium what?
I'm going to have to agree with this.Originally Posted by IronPlant
Having a large chest size does not automatically mean stretch marks.
boobiesOriginally Posted by IronPlant
Now, to be fair, I've had my fair share of disappointments with girls who I managed to get some naked with, only to find out that their killer racks become floppy, droopy flesh-sacks once unleashed. Not that I'd hold that against them, but, in cases like that, I'd rather have a nicely-shaped, smaller breast. Sheer volume isn't always the answer, a nice shape is needed too.
In Christina's case, I think that's about as nice as you're going to get for real at that size.
I'll nod to this as well. Nothing wrong with big ol' natural hooters. A man has to put his head somewhere at night.Originally Posted by Regus
Hey, guess what? That's what breasts are - droopy flesh-sacks. They're going to sag a little, you know? Some admittedly more than others, but I'd take sagging natural breasts over fake sticking-up-in-the-air-tight-as-hell-watch-out-for-Originally Posted by FuryFox
sharp-objects-they-might-explode breasts anyday. That to me is far more disgusting than the saggiest breasts possible.
Bookmarks