Rate the chick

**Megatron** · 22 Jun 2003, 04:15 PM

Kristin Kreuk deserves a 9/10.

**Josh** · 22 Jun 2003, 05:18 PM

You, however, do not. 0/10.

**Will** · 22 Jun 2003, 05:26 PM

Hey Aurora can you delete that shit please? I had a good thing going here until you reamed my thread up the ass with a 100 ft javelin.

FX · 22 Jun 2003, 05:47 PM

*Note to self - do NOT eat/drink when I know that Aurora is going to post. It only ends up on my computer screen*

**Eight One** · 22 Jun 2003, 05:58 PM

Muthafuckin' Aurora....

As least he didn't use one of those nipples as his av....

**Aurora** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:03 PM

Originally posted by Will
Hey Aurora can you delete that shit please? I had a good thing going here until you reamed my thread up the ass with a 100 ft javelin.

No, I will not remove them, as this thread sucks. Giving people numerical scores based on how they look is shallow and stupid.

The girls getting the best scores are skinny as a rail and are wearing pounds of makeup. This kind of shit makes me sick. More so than any 600 pound lady naked.

Now, I like pretty people as much as the next person, but what is happening here is retarded. I feel like going into the TNL-picture thread and rating everyone who posted a picture on a scale from 1-10, and comparing all the members on a looks-basis. Meh.

**FuryFox** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by Aurora
No, I will not remove them, as this thread sucks. Giving people numerical scores based on how they look is shallow and stupid.

While I agree, it's certainly not out of place in a society where most those people being rated got where they are because of their looks.

The girls getting the best scores are skinny as a rail and are wearing pounds of makeup.

That's only occasionally true.

Originally posted by Aurora
I feel like going into the TNL-picture thread and rating everyone who posted a picture on a scale from 1-10, and comparing all the members on a looks-basis. Meh.

Go for it, I don't think that would bother anyone at all.

You still need to admit that we're selecting people who we find attractive, and seeing what the collective tastes are among the other members. You simply posted pictures to repulse us.

**Aurora** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by FuryFox
While I agree, it's certainly not out of place in a society where most those people being rated got where they are because of their looks.

That's only occasionally true.

Go for it, I don't think that would bother anyone at all.

You still need to admit that we're selecting people who we find attractive, and seeing what the collective tastes are among the other members. You simply posted pictures to repulse us.

Yeah, it's not out of place in society, but that doesn't make it right.

Maybe I did put the pics up to repulse, but I am also repulsed by this thread. Goes hand-in-hand, I guess. I'm sick of people's idea of attractiveness to be 600 pounds of makeup and fake or large boobs. I'd much rather look at a naked 500 pounder of fat.

Comparing ideas of attractiveness and assigning a score to individuals is two different things.

**piku** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:42 PM

Says the person who bleaches and gels the hell out of his hair. Not to mention your online persona is probably about as fake as half the girls in this thread's chests. I get sick of your posts becuase I know you just act like a kitchy homosexual retard because you can.

Yes, this thread is lame. Completley lame. So is posting a bunch of fat chicks. You want to do something about it? Post some "real" girls that you like. Like I am about to do.

More: http://www.wickedweasel.com/oz/galle...ika/index.html

Check out the rest of the site too... can you believe that is a freaking online catalog?

**Aurora** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:47 PM

Originally posted by piku
Says the person who bleaches and gels the hell out of his hair. Not to mention your online persona is probably about as fake as half the girls in this thread's chests. I get sick of your posts becuase I know you just act like a kitchy homosexual retard because you can.

Yes, this thread is lame. Completley lame. So is posting a bunch of fat chicks. You want to do something about it? Post some "real" girls that you like. Like I am about to do.

Check out the rest of the site too... can you believe that is a freaking online catalog?

Because bleaching my hair and making myself look how I want is the same as rating other people's looks? Riiight.

I don't care what you think of me. The fact that you needlessly come in here and insult me on a personal shows a lot about you.

I didn't insult anyone personally when with my arguments. If that makes me a fake homosexual retard, then I feel sorry for what you are.

Maybe I can better myself by rating girls that have three things in common:

**piku** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:49 PM

Originally posted by Aurora
Because bleaching my hair and making myself look how I want is the same as rating other people's looks? Riiight.

No, you bitched about their makeup. Bleaching hair and geling it is about as close to makeup as men can get.

**Green** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:53 PM

Originally posted by Aurora
Comparing ideas of attractiveness and assigning a score to individuals is two different things.

They aren't rating the person, per se, more like rating how big of a boner they get from each picture. The other guys just want to know how big of a boner each person has. That's all.

**Regus** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:54 PM

Originally posted by frostwolf ex
i love the guy,but that was the last straw, ignore list for him.and please, quit quoting him when he is being a freak, it kills the purpose of ignoring him.

I agree with this, I like the guy when he's posting in normal topics and such, but I grew tired of his hijinks when he started using the nipple avatar, so I simply put him on ignore.

**Aurora** · 22 Jun 2003, 07:55 PM

Originally posted by piku
No, you bitched about their makeup. Bleaching hair and geling it is about as close to makeup as men can get.

I'm bitching about people rating the girls, and how people's standards of beauty is all the same. My dying and geling my hair is not putting on a ton of makeup to make myself appear flawless.

I don't see the connection here. I could gell my hair until it becomes rock hard. I could wear 5 pounds of makeup. As long as I am not judging others on this same criteria, you have no point.

Originally posted by Regus
I agree with this, I like the guy when he's posting in normal topics and such, but I grew tired of his hijinks when he started using the nipple avatar, so I simply put him on ignore.

A few days after (maybe even less) after using the nipple avatar, I didn't post on TNL for nearly 2 months. I don't understand what you mean.

FX · 22 Jun 2003, 08:02 PM

Originally posted by piku
No, you bitched about their makeup. Bleaching hair and geling it is about as close to makeup as men can get.

Do you really think Aurora dyes his hair and alters looks how he does to impress people? It seems many people think he looks rather freaky. He does this cause he wants to, so don't use that as an argument, Piku.

**piku** · 22 Jun 2003, 08:10 PM

Originally posted by FighterX
Do you really think Aurora dyes his hair and alters looks how he does to impress people? It seems many people think he looks rather freaky. He does this cause he wants to, so don't use that as an argument, Piku.

Well if that's the case than that's the case, and my point is, indeed, moot.

**Brisco Bold** · 22 Jun 2003, 10:05 PM

Originally posted by Aurora
I'm bitching about people rating the girls, and how people's standards of beauty is all the same.

Only the people here that have posted have these tastes. EVERYONE does not. (I'm not griping with you or your opinion on the thread, I'm just saying.)

**Razor Ramon** · 22 Jun 2003, 10:09 PM

Wow, this thread came to a screeching hault. Continue posting beautiful women but stop the bitching.

**Klonoa** · 22 Jun 2003, 10:37 PM

Originally posted by piku

Wow, she's chubby, but I'd hit it.

Originally posted by piku

More: http://www.wickedweasel.com/oz/galle...ika/index.html

Nice.

**bahn** · 22 Jun 2003, 10:45 PM

she's just right actually. adequate thickness.

**TaiMaiShu** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:03 PM

Indeed...

**Jetman** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:46 PM

Alrighty then - back to the gorgeous women.

Brande Roderick:This one was an FHM cover girl, Playboy supermodel, Hugh Heff's X,Bay Watch babe,and a "star" on that T.V. show where they put a bunch of has been stars M.C. Hammer, Emmanuel Lewis , ex Beverly Hills 90210 chick etc. in a house and let em live to gether for a week - ad nausem...

Totally hot blonde who could give the Pam a run for her money - 9.5 out of 10 in my book.

**bahn** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:51 PM

man...what are you doing cropping pics when we can't see uhm...down there

**TaiMaiShu** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:51 PM

My goodness...10/10

**sleeve** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:56 PM

7/10

The Playboy blonde look doesn't do it for me.

**Klonoa** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:56 PM

Originally posted by Jetman

Totally hot blonde who could give the Pam a run for her money - 9.5 out of 10 in my book.

She totally owns Pam...Pam looks like a wet dog.

**bahn** · 22 Jun 2003, 11:57 PM

Originally posted by Klonoa
She totally owns Pam...Pam looks like a wet dog.

I happen to like Pam's...face.

**Ste-Von** · 23 Jun 2003, 12:10 AM

Originally posted by sleeveboy
7/10

The Playboy blonde look doesn't do it for me.

Agreed. They all look the same, like they were mass produced or something. One of the things that makes a girl hot is individuality and style.

**Will** · 23 Jun 2003, 12:23 AM

Originally posted by Aurora
No, I will not remove them, as this thread sucks. Giving people numerical scores based on how they look is shallow and stupid.

If you didn't like the topic, then you didn't have to participate in it, especially by not posting nude photos of morbidly obese nude women. Seems like you don't have the willpower to NOT look at a thread. I started this thread based on looks alone and I think everyone who posted knew that. Also, I didn't advocate the nipple shots either as I assume they aren't too big of a deal but I'm was a bit hesitant about it since it is supposed to be public viewing friendly.

The girls getting the best scores are skinny as a rail and are wearing pounds of makeup. This kind of shit makes me sick. More so than any 600 pound lady naked.

Well what the hell do you want me to do? Go to their houses and take a photo of them without makeup? Besides there are a diverse amount of women here and I'm only choosing what I want as well as to see what you guys think. You guys are also open to any submission you'd like. It was a fun thing but you seem to be the only one having a problem with this topic.

Now, I like pretty people as much as the next person, but what is happening here is retarded. I feel like going into the TNL-picture thread and rating everyone who posted a picture on a scale from 1-10, and comparing all the members on a looks-basis. Meh.

I could care less what you do in other threads just stop fucking around this one.

**FuryFox** · 23 Jun 2003, 12:34 AM

Piku's healthy lass: 6/10 Very nice, real-looking gal. Very close to how my g/f is proportioned (although, as you may have guessed, she's considerably more well-endowed), so, despite what Aurora thinks, just because we like the look of certain people on a superficial level, it doesn't mean we don't love and find people infinitely more beautiful once we know them on a deep, personal level.

Brande Roderick: 5/10 Generic-looking blonde. The type of person you see on tv, or popular magazines...like has been mentioned, very artificial and produced looking; not my sort of thing at all.

Originally posted by Green
They aren't rating the person, per se, more like rating how big of a boner they get from each picture. The other guys just want to know how big of a boner each person has. That's all.

Oh really? Instead of a numerical scale, should we use the scared turtle/half-stock/rebar scale?

Thread: Rate the chick

Thread Tools

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions