100 Bullets Game

**TobalRox** · 13 Jun 2003, 01:39 AM

Check out this link for what little info there is:

http://ps2.ign.com/articles/423/423550p1.html

Why Acclaim???

**AaronChance** · 13 Jun 2003, 01:48 AM

Because Acclaim is desperate to do anything to halt their slow descent into oblivion. However, just like EA they occasionally luck out and produce a good game, so keep your fingers crossed.

**Saint of Killers** · 13 Jun 2003, 01:54 AM

Originally posted by Ammadeau
However, just like EA they occasionally luck out and produce a good game, so keep your fingers crossed.

Comparing EA to Acclaim is asinine. I know it's totally un-hardcore to say so, but even though they're run by Satan, EA makes tons of great games.

100 Bullets is my favorite current comic, but I can't see it making a good video game. And I especially can't see Acclaim making it good.

**AaronChance** · 13 Jun 2003, 02:08 AM

EA is just very lucky.

Maybe I should have said 'occasionally make a game I give a rat's ass about and isn't just another Sims expansion.'

**Jeremy** · 13 Jun 2003, 02:11 AM

EA's non-sports games (sports being foodball, basketball, and things of that ilk) are fantastic. Freekstyle, while frustrating, was a fun game. As was Shox. Lest we all forget the SSX games as well, which were some of the most fun snow-based games released.

**Shine** · 13 Jun 2003, 02:24 AM

Originally posted by Saint of Killers
Comparing EA to Acclaim is asinine. I know it's totally un-hardcore to say so, but even though they're run by Satan, EA makes tons of great games.

Actually... NO! EA just buys out small developers and rape them of every good property they have until the market is saturated with sequel after needless sequel and can take no more. Then when the sales drop off one half of 1% they kill the developer and "assimilate" what few good designers they have. Nope, EA is only games EA has to it's credit are sports games and Ty the Tasmanian Tiger.

Originally posted by Jeremy
EA's non-sports games (sports being foodball, basketball, and things of that ilk) are fantastic. Freekstyle, while frustrating, was a fun game. As was Shox. Lest we all forget the SSX games as well, which were some of the most fun snow-based games released.

Jer: those are sports games.

**Saint of Killers** · 13 Jun 2003, 02:49 AM

Originally posted by ShineAqua
Actually... NO! EA just buys out small developers and rape them of every good property they have until the market is saturated with sequel after needless sequel and can take no more. Then when the sales drop off one half of 1% they kill the developer and "assimilate" what few good designers they have. Nope, EA is only games EA has to it's credit are sports games and Ty the Tasmanian Tiger.

I'm not a fan of the way the company is run, but to pretend that the only thing EA developed internally are sports games is retarded. And Ty wasn't even developed by EA.