Immaculate orgasm!

[soundwave]

Hi, Super Nintendo Chalmers!

[sethsez]

In some twisted way, I'm glad to see Parcher back.

That's really depressing.

[Drewbacca]

What does any of this have to do with conformity?

Oh and welcome back. Feel free to post about whatever you want old chum.

[Parcher D.O.D.]

What does any of this have to do with conformity?

Oh and welcome back. Feel free to post about whatever you want old chum.

Ah. That's difficult for everyone to agree on. I won't try to preach, but I will say that in todays culture an accepted axiom is, "If it feels good, do it."

Being non-conformist and since I perceive the above axiom as accepted by American society, I choose to be different. You could very easily argue that those in power are the religioius right and that Americans have always been puritanical and so on and that I am in fact conforming.

I will disagree however because in popular culture sex is becoming more and more accepted. I believe we are becoming a new Soddom and Gamora.

I'm just trying to be different. Oh, and my argument for the religious right thing is that young Republicrats are as conservative as Clinton is. Sure, they wear suits but they are pretty liberal.

EDIT: Thax for the welcome and don't worry, I was not presuming to know what you are thinking. Just avoiding an unarguable discussion before it begins.

[MechDeus]

The result is an orgasm. She has the orgasm. This raises an interesting question. Did they, in fact, have sex? Was the vow of abstinance broken?

An orgasm is not sex. Many people have an orgasm during sex, but they are not one and the same.

The question is, how many orgasms has she had?

Possibly none. He could be horrible in bed or she could be among the many women who have a hard time climaxing. Just because people have sex does not mean they both orgasm.

I'm just trying to be different.

By trying to suggest that other people be different in the same way?

[FirstBlood]

Non conformity. Do I need to elaborate?

...

[Psycrow]

WTF is with all of you assholes?

Was it in some other thread that Parcher earned all of this flaming, 'cause I didn't notice anything wrong in this thread.

My thoughts exactly.

It's funny because I hear shit about Gaming Age being a bunch of elitist assholes, and here I find jackasses worthy of the nazi days of Guilty Parties.

[MechDeus]

My thoughts exactly.

It's funny because I hear shit about Gaming Age being a bunch of elitist assholes, and here I find jackasses worthy of the nazi days of Guilty Parties.

This isn't exactly the first time Parcher's been around.

[Mzo]

Um, Parcher's basically been a joke account for a while now, starting up crap topics and being generally unintelligible. He just came back, and we're all very sorry to see that.

Not that we're not elitist pricks, mind you.

[Psycrow]

Ah.

I'm just at odds with the entire reaction to this topic because it seems as if this was an honest attempt at discussion. Oh well.

This isn't exactly the first time Parcher's been around.

Obviously. I may have a low postcount myself, but I have lurked long enough to find out how long a user has been around on my own.

*points to mouse cursor hovering over postcount indicator*