One was real good for the time, I played through it a couple times and would probably buy an HD remake without much of a second thought. 2 was good when it came out, but when I booted it up like 6 months ago I found myself balking at how bad I thought it was. 3 was really enjoyable for big portions of it, the online was fixed a lot from 2 and was a much better experience. Have been meaning to go through 3 again to save all the citizens and try to clean up the cheevos.
18 year old me knew the fucking score.Originally Posted by Opaque
I don't know if the first game really stands up anymore, I tried it a while back and too many games have done everything in it better since then and I just stopped. If it's rebalanced and if the fresh coat of paint is glossy enough, maybe I can change my mind.
Do you prefer dogs or cats?
Hire one of the Amalur refugees to redo the combat and nothing else and I'll be there day 1.
Maybe day 2.
Lost in an Odyssey
Hmm, what about 2 don't you like anymore? I was going to pick that up recently.
We'll see, they seem to be adding a decent amount of changes though.
Peter Molyneaux is far more dangerous than gay marriage.
can't wake up
I didn't play Amalur for long but it seems like the sort of game Fable was supposed to be.
I started to play it but it seemed like it was just too easy and would drag on like whoa
I think I am just tired of the padded length games
Definitely need to bump it up to hard at least.
Definitely need to skip most side quests.
It had its issues, but it keep me playing for 92+ hours. That hasn't happened in forever.
Only thing that kept me from the DLC was the level cap.
Lost in an Odyssey
Gameplay video for Fable HD here: http://www.gamespot.com/e3/fable-ann...-demo-6410218/
Looks really good, very much looking forward to this.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks