Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 24567810 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 110

Thread: If Bush ran for President against Jesus

  1. Quote Originally Posted by Opaque
    News Flash:

    Fighting with Yoshi or Diffx over poilitics is like arguing with a brick wall. Just stop already.
    Don't you mean arguing with anyone on this board who has set political opinions? Why is it that the Conservatives on this board are looked at like manipulated pawns when the other members of the board argue their points in the exact same manner?
    http://www.the-nextlevel.com/board/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=1739&dateline=1225393453

  2. Quote Originally Posted by Gohron
    Don't you mean arguing with anyone on this board who has set political opinions? Why is it that the Conservatives on this board are looked at like manipulated pawns when the other members of the board argue their points in the exact same manner?
    you know what's sad?

    I said to stop it arguing with them, but even I can't stop.

  3. Conservatives on this board are looked at like manipulated pawns when the other members of the board argue their points in the exact same manner?
    Yea, seriously. People like g0zen are the enlightened ones when they spout off MoveOn dogma, but I of course have to be a slave to some giant floating Republican brain under the Denver Airport. Never mind that reading about American history and politics is a hobby of mine, I spend at least an hour a day reading all the news websites, I read mags like Time and Newsweek, when Im in school I read newspapers daily (and its mostly the liberal LA Times), I watch talking head shows all the time, Ive listened to Airhead America far more than is healthy, and the university I attend is a stronghold of Liberal Thinking.

    But nope, no none of my opinions are my own or anything.

    Hiding behind WMDs was pointless.
    Thats true. But dont the ends justify the means? If they do, then its not worth arguing over the pecularities of the WMD thing. The fact is, Hussein has had WMDs in some capcity, and he has had a WMD weapons program in place. Also, the fact is, he has supported terrorists and he would've continued to do so.

    Kerry likes to say that Bush tricked him and shit, even though Kerry had access to the same exact info that Bush did, being a senator and all.
    Last edited by diffusionx; 15 Sep 2004 at 01:55 PM.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by diffusionx
    Theres nothing on their site about that. ^_^
    I forget the exact name of the polling company, IMT/IMDB or something.
    -Kyo

  5. Quote Originally Posted by Opaque
    I have a candy bar, right here. Right now. I am going to eat it in a few minutes. So if you came over in an hour and tried to find a candy bar, you won't find one, because there are no more candy bars here. Even if Bush told you there were.

  6. Quote Originally Posted by StriderKyo
    I forget the exact name of the polling company, IMT/IMDB or something.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402577/

  7. Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi
    Besides all of that, the invasion of Iraq was 100% justified even if we knew there no WMDs. Saddam was a threat to Democracy that needed to be removed. He wasn't the first and won't be the last.
    I don't think a war is justified if you have to lie to the American public to sell it.

    In my opinion, Bush should have focussed all his attention on Afghanistan and the capture (or killing) of Osama bin Laden before doing anything else.
    R.I.P. Paragon Studios

  8. Quote Originally Posted by dave is ok
    Anyone know when that's supposed to come out?

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi
    Exactly. Let us no forget that the founding fathers realized that the average American was and always will be an idiot, so they put the Electoral College in place to salvage the nation from its own idiocy.

    And thats democracy how?

    Quote Originally Posted by diffusionx
    Yea, seriously. People like g0zen are the enlightened ones when they spout off MoveOn dogma, but I of course have to be a slave to some giant floating Republican brain under the Denver Airport.

    Then stop being partisan, and understand that the only things that matter are facts and track record, not which party the candidate came from.

    If Dan Quayle was president right now, I'd have a hard time believing you could go against him.


    Never mind that reading about American history and politics is a hobby of mine, I spend at least an hour a day reading all the news websites, I read mags like Time and Newsweek, when Im in school I read newspapers daily (and its mostly the liberal LA Times), I watch talking head shows all the time, Ive listened to Airhead America far more than is healthy, and the university I attend is a stronghold of Liberal Thinking.
    I don't care what your opinions are, I just don't see an intelligent man, thinking that Bush isn't going to fuck this world up.



    But nope, no none of my opinions are my own or anything.

    I've seen you maybe once, no twice, disagree with the republicans, but then you immediately defended them, so I think you like to believe your opinions on these matters are your own, but the second anyone attacks the party you like to associate with, you can't take it, even if the claims are legit.




    Thats true. But dont the ends justify the means? If they do, then its not worth arguing over the pecularities of the WMD thing. The fact is, Hussein has had WMDs in some capcity, and he has had a WMD weapons program in place. Also, the fact is, he has supported terrorists and he would've continued to do so.
    No they don't. Thats the point.

    We didn't go after Hitler on false presumptions, we did go after Saddam under them. Thats it really. Your president lied to get this country into a ground war in Iraq....


    Considering we almost impeached Clinton over a blowjob (and don't argue he lied in court, cause he lied in court over a blowjob, which ultimately means nothing to anyone but the religious right, who've never had one), which one seems worse?





    Kerry likes to say that Bush tricked him and shit, even though Kerry had access to the same exact info that Bush did, being a senator and all.

    Dude. Kerry never should have been talking about his war record that much I can agree with.

    But the fact is, Kerry is retarded for not understanding that these accusations are coming from somebody who didn't even go to the Vietnam War, and probably begged daddy to get him into the guard cause he was too chicken shit to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Opaque
    you know what's sad?

    I said to stop it arguing with them, but even I can't stop.

    Thats why I ignore you.

    No offense.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bacon McShig
    Bam.

    That's the straight shit, right there.

    Yes it is.
    Quote Originally Posted by William Oldham
    Sing a song of Madeleine-Mary
    A tune that all can carry
    Burly says if we don't sing
    Then we won't have anything...

  10. We didn't go after Hitler on false presumptions, we did go after Saddam under them. Thats it really. Your president lied to get this country into a ground war in Iraq....
    Hitler never attacked the US. Japan did.

    PREEMPTIVE, ILLEGAL ATTACK! END THE OCCUPATION OF GERMANY NOW!

    I've seen you maybe once, no twice, disagree with the republicans, but then you immediately defended them, so I think you like to believe your opinions on these matters are your own, but the second anyone attacks the party you like to associate with, you can't take it, even if the claims are legit.
    You dont even know where I stand on so many issues yet you say trash like this. Fact is, the only thing political people talk about on TNL is the war in Iraq, then Almaci comes in and ruins it. So youre getting a one-sided view of me from one issue where yes, I do side with conservatives.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo