How about taking over the world or blowing up military buildings?Originally Posted by Saint of Killers
That was the first thing I thought of when I read the initial post.Originally Posted by Mamoscott
Threatening to kill the president isn't protected speech. And your privacy is sacrificed the instant you post something on a public Livejournal.Originally Posted by g0zen
How about taking over the world or blowing up military buildings?Originally Posted by Saint of Killers
That's not the point.Originally Posted by Saint of Killers
Right, but once they've determined the threat is NOT there, how can they then keep you on record in their database alongside REAL threats? Certainly I can understand investigating potential threats to the life of the President, but keeping people on record who're proven to pose NO threat is unjustifiable and a clear violation of one's civil rights.Originally Posted by diffusionx
Time for a change
Basicly guys don't use the following words together unless you wanna get a look over from the humourless men with pretty sunglasses.
Koran, assassinate, bomb, jihad, atomic, nuclear, president, football (as in the nuclear code book the pres has), purple monkey dishwasher.
Cause people are assholes and these days if someone doesn't like your political notions they're more inclined to tattle on you than ever. But if the SS inteprets even a remote threat to the commander in chief or other persons in their charge it is their job to check it out. Sometimes doing yer job means being an asshole but being an asshole isn't doing you job.
Why on earth would you not keep the records of the investigation? Deleting them would be ten times more stupid than keeping them.Originally Posted by g0zen
If the report made turned out to be in error or the threat completely absent then there is no reason whatsoever to keep those records on file. They should be expunged without question. We destory a juvenile''s criminal record when they turn 18, yet we keep files on completely innocent people we were reported mistakenly? That's pretty stupid.Originally Posted by Yoshi
Time for a change
It didn't turn out to be in error. It turned out to not be a threat. The information that this dumb bitch was making threats was 100% accurate and worth keeping the penny worth of drive space it would require to store.Originally Posted by g0zen
Exactly. She's so stupid to make such statments that she should live with them forever anyway. They don't have a file on me...but that's because I didn't act like a total idiot.
I want to see this feature.Originally Posted by Rtificial
Even if it only goes to cka.
If it turns out to not be a threat, then yes it IS an error. The idea is to protect the President from any threat on his life, none of which was here. Once that is determined why on Earth do they need to keep the file? Police don't keep a file on every person they suspect of every crime, especially once they've proven the person isn't guilty. That same logic should apply here. If she posed a real threat, yeah keep tabs on her, otherwise respect for a person's privacy should come first.Originally Posted by Yoshi
Time for a change
Bookmarks