You STILL didn't read what ANYONE said. Hahaha.Originally Posted by diffusionx
the Crash King
more...
Sony also unveiled the PS3's graphics chip, the RSX "Reality Synthesizer based on Nvidia technology. The GPU will be capable of 128bit pixel precision, 1080p resolution, some of the highest HD resolution around. It also has over 300 million transistors lager than any processor available commercially today. It was manufactured using the 90nm process with 8 layers of metal. The RSX is more powerful than two GeForce 6800 ultras, which would cost rough $1000 if bought today.
Analyzing Data 100%
livejournal user guide vol 1
Yeah floating point only determines 3D performance, good thing we are going through a 2D renaissance right now!
Huell-in-training
Not sure if these pictures are legit PS3 screen shots. Take it for what it's worth.
Metronome
2 Days to Vegas
Last edited by The Chronicle; 16 May 2005 at 07:32 PM.
Old Country Doctor
I called that bluetooth shit in the other PS3 thread.
edit: nintendo revolution thread
Last edited by cka; 17 May 2005 at 08:24 AM.
Analyzing Data 100%
Cotton-headed Ninny Muggins
Who cares. if their first wave/launch games suck shit, like the PS2 launch then I'm getting an Xbox360 first.
It's all about the games. The system is secondary.
zzzzzzzz
I'm wondering, how many of the add-on features (support for 7 wireless controllers, various media inputs, 6 USB ports, etc) were added between Thursday and today?
*chirp*
Am I the only one completely unexcited about the relative graphic power of these new systems?
I'm honestly not expecting to see a hugely noticable difference between XBox, PS3, and Revolution games. It doesn't matter and I don't care.
Analyzing Data 100%
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks