P. Diddy's wife is insane

[Yoshi]

I'm not getting AIDs, no matter what you assholes say.

Abstinence works, huh Dave?

[MrWhitefolks]

the issue isnt that she wants MORE child support, it's that there's no way in hell she's gone from spending 8k a month on her kid to 21k

[Diff-chan]

the issue isnt that she wants MORE child support, it's that there's no way in hell she's gone from spending 8k a month on her kid to 21k

Like I told IronPlant, youre really not in any position to say that or make that decision.

[Fe 26]

NY must be an awesome state. They really got it figured out. In my own state, sad little Mississippi, our judges do not have awesome bullshit detectors. My best friend throughout middle school and highschool came from a broken home and his mother screws his dad over on the child support to this day. But you don't have to pay alimony, and I don't even think you have to split up your shit here. So whatever.

Blah blah blah, I hate simple conversation blah blah blah I'm an asshole

[Omni]

NY must be an awesome state.

It is.

[Diff-chan]

My best friend throughout middle school and highschool came from a broken home and his mother screws his dad over on the child support to this day. But you don't have to pay alimony, and I don't even think you have to split up your shit here. So whatever.

NY > MS, thats for sure.

Anyway, that case and whatever else is NOT THE SAME AS THE P DIDDY CASE. Why dont you guys get that? P Diddy's case is in fact very different from 99.999999% of everyone else's and nobody should draw conclusions from those cases to P Diddy's or vice versa. Werent you the one who was bitching about how cases are different and its not black and white and shit in the piracy thread? Give me a break.

[MrWhitefolks]

Like I told IronPlant, youre really not in any position to say that or make that decision.

and you're in the position to argue for it?

when courts start demanding itemized reciepts and whatnot from child support receivers that PROVES the money is being spent on the CHILD, then i'll have no problem paying out the nose if a divorce goes down.

secondly, if you're going to try and defend this, at least give me a full blown explanation(or even some links/points of reference) as to WHY it's different from the other 99% of cases where the woman is getting money she doesnt spend on the child that it is appointed too and i'll be able to have a decent conversation over the fact.

[Calliander]

When my parents got divorced, the judge THOROUGHLY went over the sorts of things my mother needed for my sister (I was over 18), then set the support payments accordingly. Every month until my sister turned 18, my mother had to fax or otherwise deliver to a court official a detailed list of how she spent the payments.

That's Connecticut.

Isn't that standard everywhere? I believe there's a huge misinterpretation of how child support is handled and think women are going around willy-nilly spending money that's intended for children. There's a lot of not paying child support going on, but I think that's more to do with most "deadbeat dads" hardly making enough money to support themselves in the first place.

[MrWhitefolks]

nah, that's not the standard at all. they DO set base rules, but for the most part the courts have more important things to deal with, so they let ALOT of it slide.

while deadbeat dads are asses and should be taken care of accordingly, there ARE an equal amount of women who missappropriate funds. but this in fact is neither here nor there as it all comes down to what the CHILD needs, as that should be the main priority(which in most cases, it is not)

[Dolemite]

It is.

Yup. It's expensive to live here, though.