Originally Posted by
StriderKyo
Is every DS thread going to be this retarded? "Wahhh, the hardware lets it have more interesting gameplay ideas than anything else, but the graphics are from 5 years ago. I'm going to bitch about it and say I wish it was on PSP, uh, I mean "Gamecube," and had marginally better graphics and a sub-PS1 single analogue control scheme, because that would make it 10x more fun!! This is bullshit! You said I could have any game I wanted Sony, and you lied!! I want some motherfukkin' chocolate milk!!"
Because really, if so, I want you guys to go into every single Xbox, Gamecube, PSP, PS2, Xbox 360, Revolution and PS3 thread and gripe about how the game is inadequate because it isn't running on a Nasa level supercomputer. Because clearly, games are being held back by behind-the-curve hardware.
Shut up already.
Also, while I've had 4 hours of sleep and I'm ranting:
Nobody's making you play this game in a rainbow-filled spring meadow any more than you have to hook up your tv on the gazebo and play RE4 on a sunny Sunday afternoon, jackass.
If this is more powerful hardware than the first three games ran on, how can it be inadequte? "Blah blah 3D walls blah blah" yeah, I'm sure Capcom hadn't thought of that. If only Ocarina of Time was able to generate some form of atmosphere 10 years ago on hardware less powerful than DS.
Metroid Prime Hunters controls just fine. If you'd spent 10-20 minutes with it - Ie. gotten through the whole demo 2-3 times, instead of 30 seconds in EB while some fat kid with a Pokemon backpack is drooling on your sleeve, the control scheme would feel second nature. It pretty much exactly replicates digital movement and mouselook. Unless I'm some kind of stylus god because I can whip straight through it without getting hit.
I'm sure there's more, but I need to lie down...
Bookmarks