Pwnt.
YES MGS OMG
No, I thought 360 held it's own.
I wasn't swayed either way.
You've got it backwards. Sony didn't have to prove itself, Microsoft did. Sony is the leader, still has plenty of time, and has outdone MS at every turn thus far. MS is the one that needed to be selling itself.Originally Posted by StriderKyo
I like how you made the only pro-PS3 choice an involuntary pledge of MGS love, btw. You're turning into more of a GameFAQs poster than me, Strider.![]()
Pwnt.
There are too many games either out or still coming for current systems for me to consider the next gen for at least a year, and that's not even counting handhelds. My pile of shame is a mountain right now and it's only getting worse.
"I've watched while the maggots have defiled the earth. They have
built their castles and had their wars. I cannot stand by idly any longer." - Otogi 2
I'm getting both systems....OOPS...wrong answer.
I think they needed another year before launching, and that goes for both systems.
Dont be a robot, be human.
PSN: Di3heart
Originally Posted by g0zen
Keeping it brief, haiku style:
Spring raindrops, less than
virtual conversations
with whiny girlfriend
Originally Posted by Andy
Originally Posted by Andy
Originally Posted by Andy
Originally Posted by Andy
I'm not really sure what the issue is here.Originally Posted by Andy
No, there's nothing wrong with that - if you've got the cash, then go for it. I think all three look promising for one reason or another. I just wanted to see if people felt Sony had MEGATONNED the competition again like they did with PS2.Originally Posted by PepsimanVsJoe
Last edited by StriderKyo; 19 Sep 2005 at 01:45 PM.
-Kyo
Not for the 360. The jury is out on the PS3.Originally Posted by MVS
Originally Posted by StriderKyo
It is finished. He'll be wondering why he bought it.Originally Posted by Andrew
And personally, I agree with Strider on MGS's corny dialogue. The games themselves are fun to play, however.
Agreed…360 doesn't interest me. PS3 appears to be a must-buy, and the Revolution is oddly starting to get my interest. It all depends on if they turn this mish-mash of insane ideas into something that actually works for a gaming console, or if it turns into another Virtual Boy. Oh, and some decent 3rd party support wouldn't hurt this time, either.Nintendo and Sony are really the only systems I think I'll need. But it's still too early to tell.
MS is going the Saturn route with 360...rushing it to market and underwhelming the masses. Exactly what they don't need.
Dolemite, the Bad-Ass King of all Pimps and Hustlers
Gymkata: I mean look at da lil playah woblin his way into our hearts in the sig awwwwwww
Yep. Except without Daytona or Panzer Dragoon.Originally Posted by Dolemite
Ditto.Originally Posted by Yoshi
If ever there was a system that screams 'Price Drop', especially with the standard 60 dollar games, it was XB360. I'll do the same with PS3.
New policy is 3 games I really want to play + Price Drop = Sold.
It's like Star Wars, even the originals have some of the most contrived and just bad dialogue ever. Still good movies.Originally Posted by Dolemite
Following up on Andrew's question, why is the PS3 option written in that gamefaqs style, anyways? That tough to hold the disdain in, strider?
Bookmarks