Yeah if it ends enough jobs to cause civil unrest it will be fixed.
By Washington? Seriously?
Yeah if it ends enough jobs to cause civil unrest it will be fixed.
Wat. They voted overwhelmingly to delay the mandate until 2015.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...al-device-tax/
Then, less than a year later, they tried to sue Obama for... delaying the mandate until 2015.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/0...te-108778.html
Come on guys. We know the government isn't going to fix anything and at best they'll do nothing at all. We have to believe in our insurance/healthcare industry, they provide the best service in the world and know exactly what they're doing. It's really in our best interest to just trust them on all matters. If they're doing a bad job I can just take my money elsewhere and let capitalism do it's thing.
Currently Playing: Final Fantasy V Pixel Remaster (PC), Let's Build a Zoo (PC) & Despot's Game (PC)
Get Free Bitcoins every hour! - www.freebitco.in
Where does it say anything about the employer mandate in that article?
edit: On the contrary, it was delayed by the White House until January 1, 2015 and then again until 2016. If it's a good idea and part of a bill that you signed, why would you delay it on the up-and-up?
Last edited by Yoshi; 14 Mar 2015 at 03:34 PM.
Yep, it was way better before that commie tried to make some changes. Let the uninsurable go into massive debt or die. Its the american way. I mean if they were smart they would take a minimum wage part time job at Target for the insurance. Or have had a better job in the first place, there's a huge number of them available to anyone who is willing to work hard.
I'd like to know how many of those openings are full time jobs with benefits.
Bookmarks