They could at least do some justice to the Absorbing man.
News from AICN.com
Not sure if I like the "Re-Do" aspect.Originally Posted by AICN.com
I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.
They could at least do some justice to the Absorbing man.
"Your soul better belong to Jesus, mmm-mmmmm..... cause your ass belongs to me!"
Abomination, anyone?
OMG <3 4EVA
Scourge:Azumanga Daioh is exactly the same thing as Ninja Scroll.
buttcheeks: High school so weird
Or Rhino for that matter.
"Your soul better belong to Jesus, mmm-mmmmm..... cause your ass belongs to me!"
Ugh. It's gonna be big and dumb.It will be big and awesome and a big ride.
I really don't know what to say considering so many people actually liked the Fantastic 4 movie.
"Chuy, you're going to have a magical life. Because no matter where you go, it's always going to be better than Tucson."
Does this mean doing the origin in the first five minutes as though mutation is common and then stomping around for a while as the transformation triggers only at sunset? If anything, leave the origin as is handled by Ang Lee and skip to the part in the comics where the Hulk was worth reading, by which I mean Peter David's run.I loved the HULK movie, it was just a different approach, and it wasn’t exactly the comic. We want to be much closer to the comic.Truth.I’d rather see a HULK continuance that is “truer” in essence and vibe to its source material, than to watch yet another re-hashed origin story.
They got exactly what they wanted from it.Originally Posted by Revoltor
Yes. I'm not going to sit through another Hulk movie about his origin. Whether you think Ang Lee fucked up or not, it's too late. Ang Lee's origin wasn't that bad, either. It wasn't the best choice but probably a good foundation.Originally Posted by MechDeus
Keep Eric Bana, too. He seemed like a good choice for Bruce Banner to me. I could be wrong, I'm not too knowledgeable of The Hulk, but if nothing else Bana can act.
Originally Posted by rezo
I should re-watch the hulk I remember hating it but I can't recall why. Anyway, abomination played by ron pearlmen would be the best villain choice for 2. As for the origin re-telling it was fine the first time, why fix what isn't broken?
I liked the Hulk, but the bottom line is that it's a drama and not an action movie.
Check out my blog: ExHardcoreGamer.com
Why remake it? His origin is set - thanks to sacrificing himself for Betty, he becomes the savage Hulk when angry - so just run with it now. X1 is worse than X2, Spider-man is worse than Spider-man 2, etcetera.
Maybe they think they can't do crap with the Hulk in terms of an actual story other than the origin plot, but I'd disagree. Have Banner be a fugitive (open the movie with an army of Hulkbusters discovering Banner), with Betty leading the charge for a cure, while the Government/military studies/creates a theoretical army of Hulks of its own (which opens the door for the Abomination, or army of Abominations) - perhaps in the process of recreating the "Hulk" transformation, Commander Ross use Betty's work and/or betray her trust, which continues the sins of the father theme from the original feature.
Maybe that drives her into Bruce's arms at the end of the movie, or maybe she dies at the end, whatever.
Last edited by Geo; 12 Jun 2006 at 12:43 PM.
Bookmarks