Page 5 of 133 FirstFirst ... 34567919 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 1323

Thread: Official Car News and Discussion Thread

  1. eh.

  2. Quote Originally Posted by he who shall never be named View Post
    eh.


    FATALITY.

  3. Quote Originally Posted by he who shall never be named View Post
    lol yeah. I have to talk shit because I own one (imagine that). This bitch handles like a dream. Not that fast -- this is true, but <3 k20z3 i-vtec. Sounds like sex.
    Fair 'nuff, fair 'nuff. It beats my car ('01 Impreza 2.5 RS) though I still think my car's the prettiest ever made
    Quote Originally Posted by Nomi View Post
    Gold and bronze rims look like shit. I still don't understand why the blue WRX is marketed with the bronze rims all the time, it looks horrible to me.
    Blue paint + bronze rims is how the rally Impreza is decorated in Europe (Colin McRae made it famous). I agree that gold rims look dumb most of the time, but I admit that I'm a sucker for them on an Impreza.
    Quote Originally Posted by aren View Post
    Z > evo, sti, your mom, etc.
    You're comparing a two-door roadster to four-door sedans. Just sayin'.

  4. Quote Originally Posted by MarkRyan View Post
    You're comparing a two-door roadster to four-door sedans. Just sayin'.
    350z - 300 hp
    STI - 300 hp, turbocharged
    EVO MR - 286 hp, turbocharged

    These cars all in the same class.
    Last edited by aren; 04 Oct 2006 at 10:17 PM.

  5. Quote Originally Posted by MarkRyan View Post
    You're comparing a two-door roadster to four-door sedans. Just sayin'.
    Two four door sedans that are faster than it ironically.

  6. Quote Originally Posted by stormy View Post
    Two four door sedans that are faster than it ironically.
    From the November 2006 issue of Car & Driver:

    The 350z out performed the other cars selected in the "under 30K" class. The track they tested at was VIR. The lap time rankings were as follows:

    car - best lap time (min:secs), peak speed (mph), max lateral g

    1) 350Z Track - 3:12.5, 124.3, 0.9
    2) Evo MR - 3:13.5, 124, 0.94
    3) RX-8 - 3:19.0, 116.4, 0.86
    4) Cobalt SS - 3:20.6, 117.1, 0.85
    5) Mustang GT - 3:20.9, 119.3, 0.88
    6) GTI - 3:25.1, 112.0, 0.82
    7) Civic Si - 3:26.5, 111.6, 0.80
    8) MX-5 - 3:29.3, 108.6, 0.83

  7. Quote Originally Posted by aren View Post
    350z - 300 hp
    STI - 300 hp, turbocharged
    EVO MR - 286 hp, turbocharged

    These cars all in the same class.
    So the 190HP Lotus Elise is in what class?

  8. 300ZX twin turbo > 350Z
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1990-96-Nissan-300ZX-92809101990002.JPG 
Views:	86 
Size:	48.6 KB 
ID:	20930  

  9. Skyline for the win.



    Fuck the 350z.
    I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me.

  10. Quote Originally Posted by aren View Post
    From the November 2006 issue of Car & Driver:

    The 350z out performed the other cars selected in the "under 30K" class. The track they tested at was VIR. The lap time rankings were as follows:

    car - best lap time (min:secs), peak speed (mph), max lateral g

    1) 350Z Track - 3:12.5, 124.3, 0.9
    2) Evo MR - 3:13.5, 124, 0.94
    3) RX-8 - 3:19.0, 116.4, 0.86
    4) Cobalt SS - 3:20.6, 117.1, 0.85
    5) Mustang GT - 3:20.9, 119.3, 0.88
    6) GTI - 3:25.1, 112.0, 0.82
    7) Civic Si - 3:26.5, 111.6, 0.80
    8) MX-5 - 3:29.3, 108.6, 0.83
    Way to judge cars by one test on one track. Which incidentally is in question because no one can figure out how the Z posted such a good time, particularly since the Evo does pretty much everything better than a Z does and spanks them on tracks regularly.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo