Yeah, Sushi-X was a played by several writers, but most Ken Williams.
He was the joke reviewer made up by the staff, wasn't he? I think more than one person wrote under his name but I'm not sure. Still, "he" was better than idiots like Parish any day. That guy's arrogance, bad taste, bad writing, and lack of gaming experience rolled into one.
Yeah, Sushi-X was a played by several writers, but most Ken Williams.
Right, Sushi was sort of their version of a lovable toned down GF type mascot. The few folks who wrote for him though did a good job IMHO. My fave review by "him" was for Mischief Makers. He gave it either a 7 or 7.5 (mainly due to the levels being so short). But it was tempered with just the right mix of both caution and enthusiasm that I still wanted the game.
100% agreed. IMHO someone like Ben Turner (his Treasure and Guardian Legend/Compile retrospectives were great reads) should've been the 1 Up reviewer farmed over to EGM, not Parish.
Anyways, still too low on funds to buy EEE.![]()
I love the cover too. Speaking of ace 70s sci fi style art, for some reason the woman's face with the font lines running out of her head rvaguely eminds me of the Famicom cover art for Guardian Legend, just much more colorful:
![]()
Last edited by 1CCOSA; 17 Nov 2006 at 07:01 PM.
Doesn't look like Ben T does much on 1Up these days. As mentioned before, here is his excellent "Crucial Classics" feature on The Guardian Legend which includes a nice reference side bar on Compile's history:Me: 100% agreed. IMHO someone like Ben Turner (his Treasure and Guardian Legend/Compile retrospectives were great reads) should've been the 1 Up reviewer farmed over to EGM, not Parish.
http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3142613
...and his 2005 Treasure retrospective feature (which was done in anticipation of GSH):
http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3145006&did=1
Last edited by 1CCOSA; 17 Nov 2006 at 07:03 PM.
"Crucial Classics" could end up being a good feature when they finally finish it, depending on what games they choose(Wonderboy III, please). I like how they discuss various games within each pick's article.
I have noticed a bunch of historical errors though, like the usual crediting Nintendo for stuff they didn't invent(password system). Maybe when it's complete I will send them a list.![]()
'minds me of this Trans Am/Fucking Champs co-op EP cover.
![]()
This game is bad-ass, but like most games of its ilk, very short. Has something of a learning curve, but take the tutorial course and a few playthroughs will see you to the end. Only problem though is that there's very little replay value, even for high score nuts.
Here's another nicely detailed review:
http://www.ntsc-uk.com/review.php?pl...eryExtendExtra
Being a high score nut is how most of my shooters get their replay value.
Last edited by 1CCOSA; 18 Nov 2006 at 02:35 AM.
Bookmarks