Studies of my income have revealed that I still cannot justify the purchase of a video game console at that price, ever.
A new price vs. performance analysis of the PlayStation 3 has revealed that Sony will lose more than $300 per console sold, but researchers were so impressed with its engineering that they view it as a bargain. Also, a comparative analysis of the Xbox 360 reveals that MS is starting to profit on hardware.
More...
(Link to GameDaily.com)
Studies of my income have revealed that I still cannot justify the purchase of a video game console at that price, ever.
HA! HA! I AM USING THE INTERNET!!1
My Backloggery
So let me get this article straight here:
Sony's PS3 is an Engineering marvel and they're losing $300 per system.
MS's Zboz get's no engineering accolades, but MS makes a couple a' bucks profit for each Zboz they sell...
And both the Zboz and PS3 do the same damn thing.
Reporters R grate at Maths!
If it's such a marvel of engineering, why does it break the first time you drop it? Why are a good percentage of the initial shipment total bricks?
Is this a joke? There should never be a first time. How reckless are people with their shit?
A guy I roomed with way back once whined that Apple needed to make their power connectors (pre-MagSafe) sturdier because he bent the connector after dropping it a number of times. He was really angry about it. My suggestion? STOP DROPPING YOUR FUCKING LAPTOP.
Not that I'm defending Sony's build quality if they're shipping bricks. But seriously... I own two of the big grey PS1 systems, a PSP, and a launch PS2. Nothing has ever gone wrong with any of them short of a single dead pixel on the PSP. The PS2 made me nervous for a while, but still no DREs. With questions like that one above, though, I kind of wonder if I'm just extraordinarily lucky, or if the average owner is routinely throwing their consoles around.
Bookmarks