Page 60 of 331 FirstFirst ... 465658596061626474 ... LastLast
Results 591 to 600 of 3307

Thread: Election Thread 2012

  1. Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi View Post
    So your claim is that that is equal? Keep in mind most of the Rush shit storm was after the apology.
    Maybe not entirely equal, but nowhere near as lopsided as you think

    Rush really underestimated this shitstorm and his apology was proof of that - listen to it. He blames the whole thing on sinking down to the liberal level and saying things a liberal would say.

  2. Quote Originally Posted by Doc Holliday View Post
    I don't want Romney to win because all it does is prove America is one big whore, bent over and ready to get fucked for a pile of money and all Obama accepting SuperPACs does is reaffirm that notion.


    EDIT: detailed SuperPAC totals: http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/supe...php?cycle=2012
    So far the Romney RobertsPAC has spent 33.8 Mil and raised 36.8 Mil
    the Gingrich RobertsPAC spent 16.3 Mil and raised 13.1 Mil
    the Obama RobertsPAC spent 0.8 Mil and raised 4.5 Mil
    the Paul RobertsPAC spent 3.1 Mil and Raised 3.4 Mil
    the Santorum RobertsPAC spent 5.9 Mil and has only raised 2.8 Million dollars.

    What exactly happens to this debt when it's all said & done??
    Last edited by Doc Holliday; 13 Mar 2012 at 11:28 AM. Reason: Left out Paul (these are also just the top PACs for each canidate, there are many more)
    It is good to carry some powdered rouge in one's sleeve. It may happen that when one is sobering up or waking from sleep, a samurai's complexion may be poor. At such a time it is good to take out and apply some powdered rouge.

  3. We start five wars.

    Anthony: I don't really care if she takes all the dicks in france.

  4. The Super PACs are a damn disaster. Remember when Obama claimed he would stick to public funding? Boy does that seem like 100 years ago. Once one guy goes down this path, everyone has to.

  5. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

    ^^direct contributions. As you can guess, >50% of Obama's donations are under $200, >50% of Romney's are the $2,500 maximum.
    It is good to carry some powdered rouge in one's sleeve. It may happen that when one is sobering up or waking from sleep, a samurai's complexion may be poor. At such a time it is good to take out and apply some powdered rouge.

  6. I wouldn't be surprised if this presidential election goes into the billions.

  7. What a waste, although I guess that money does get pumped back into the economy, especially in swing states.

  8. Obama should buy ad slots on the EIB. I hear they need sponsors.
    It is good to carry some powdered rouge in one's sleeve. It may happen that when one is sobering up or waking from sleep, a samurai's complexion may be poor. At such a time it is good to take out and apply some powdered rouge.

  9. The SuperPACS are bad because of the shady nature of it. But goddamn, Obama has raised 66 Mil in small direct contributions. That's more than all the major SuperPACs combined! He certainly doesn't need the 4.5 from his or Maher's 1.

    So if money is not the issue... than... it's content?


    Get ready for some mud.
    It is good to carry some powdered rouge in one's sleeve. It may happen that when one is sobering up or waking from sleep, a samurai's complexion may be poor. At such a time it is good to take out and apply some powdered rouge.

  10. Yeah, this is going to be a horrific general election in terms of tone.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo