Election Thread 2016

[Yoshi]

I oppose wasting resources on anything that only effects 1% of anything when we have enough real problems to solve. I oppose passing stupid amendments to make it harder to legalize as much as I oppose the legalization. If it's a rounding error of an impact, then it's a rounding error of an issue.

I like how you still can't separate religion and morals, as if having standards of any kind is foreign to you.

Also, I'm hungry.

[Frogacuda]

What resources? Just do the right thing and shut the fuck up, that's all there is to it.

[FirstBlood]

I oppose wasting resources on anything that only effects 1% of anything when we have enough real problems to solve.

You are so fucking disgusting.

[bbobb]

The best thing is that he supports legislation to protect endangered species.

[Nick]

Keep personal attacks out of this thread.

[Bojack]

It's the exact opposite. Any power not specifically granted to the federal government is to remain with the states.

Because the Federal gov. GIVES them the authority to do things they didn't talk about. I don't know of a single place in the entire constitution, amendments or otherwise that say the States are above the Fed. The states give no power to the Fed. It's the other way around. That's why the states cannot choose to ignore amendments with out Washington say so or impose their laws on other states or impose laws on DC. States actual have 0 authority apart from what the const. gives them. The 10th amendment simply states things left out of the constitution can be handled by the states, it never says things left can or should only forever and ever be handled by the states. We are reading the same constitution right?

States rights are nice to have but they are not absolute nor permanent in any sense.

I oppose wasting resources on anything that only effects 1% of anything when we have enough real problems to solve.

Here we have it folks. Oppression doesn't matter if it only affects a few.

[Fe 26]

I oppose wasting resources on anything that only effects 1% of anything when we have enough real problems to solve.

if you were really for this, you would be for the fed going ahead and making gay marriage ok.

Cause we both know the republican party waste a shit ton of money and time fighting it.

You can't tell me that you'd rather that effort go somewhere else.

[Diff-chan]

A disproportionate amount of resources should go into protecting the rights of small minorities of people, because they are the ones most likely to be marginalized.

[dave is ok]

I oppose wasting resources on anything that only effects 1% of anything when we have enough real problems to solve.

..except when it's voter fraud or welfare fraud - because even though those things are statistically insignificant, I hate poors.

[Yoshi]

The best thing is that he supports legislation to protect endangered species.

Marriage may be like death, but not in the scientific way. If gay people can't get married, are we going to potentially lose the ability to cure cancer?