There is no blanket "socialism" or "capitalism" in real world economics. There are always shades and degrees. The Nordic models are more socialistic for example, we are pretty far on the side of capitalism. They both have pitfalls, but what is the optimal balance should change in relation to technology, demographics, and morals.
Big word right there. Unfortunately it contradicts the concepts of our capitalistic system, and morals are the one thing that is sorely lacking in our government and business leaders (perhaps even our society - the popularity of the Kardashians is a perfect example). Democratic Socialism, at least from the stuff I've been reading, encourages capitalism but is also cognizant of the moral obligation to the well-being of others. I believe it's called "being a good human being".
While a more capitalistic lean might have worked in the past, modern technological advances removing sections of our job force combined with a sense of entitlement to bend laws by the super rich are pretty much forcing our hand towards a more socialistic system then we currently have.
Agreed. And this is why Sanders is getting a lot of attention. IMO, he's authentic and is addressing issues that the populous has turned a blind eye to but will no longer ignore. I can't help but think of the movie Network - I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!!
Last edited by Type Ryan; 11 Feb 2016 at 06:49 PM.
"To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often." -- Winston Churchill
I respectfully disagree. Asses or no, the Kardashians have absolutely zero redeeming qualities as human beings. They are egotistical, shallow, wastes of human DNA. I mean, do you see how the Madame of the family pimps her daughters out? It's disgusting. But I'll let you fap to their asses if that suits you. 'Tis a free country.
"To improve is to change; to be perfect is to change often." -- Winston Churchill
Bookmarks