It'll pass. Gun manufactures love anything that keeps out foreign competition
More gun control? Maybe not. I hope I am not proven wrong, but I am not sure how this bozo's foreign policy could be a bigger disaster. I'm honestly starting to question whether giving the UN or Putin the lead might not actually be preferable to the trifecta of Obama, Clinton, and Kerry.
It'll pass. Gun manufactures love anything that keeps out foreign competition
Were averted? So the chemical weapons have been confirmed secured? And if it is successful, wouldn't that just be a feather in Putin's cap?
Last edited by Yoshi; 25 Sep 2013 at 06:59 PM.
Call it macaroni.
Having a feather in Putin's cap and the result being good because of it should cause mass questioning as to HOW THE FUCK THAT HAPPENED. Hopefully the next go around like this the American side will learn.
Originally Posted by rezo
Americans don't get that this isn't a zero sum game. Something can benefit both Putin AND the US. That's the point of diplomacy really. The fact that we aren't out there blowing up yet another series of brown people and creating the next generation of jihadists is unquestionably a good thing. It shows that we can work within a diplomatic framework to solve problems in the Middle East. Let's follow up on Syria and do more of it please!
Last edited by Diff-chan; 26 Sep 2013 at 09:19 AM.
We didn't do anything. That's the problem. Obama and Kerry's lack of decisiveness led to Putin gaining global clout, which is anything but a win. And then McCain exacerbated the problem by acknowledging him in that op ed piece. It's interesting how no one took Romney seriously when he said Russia was a serious threat. Too bad the clown that theoretically has all the information wasn't that savvy.
You do realize that Russia is the only country with any influence in Syria, right? You can't do anything WRT Syria without going through Russia. That's how diplomacy works.
Bookmarks