
Originally Posted by
Andrew
Yes, but in a fair and just society we should not reallocate the sweat of a man's brow indiscriminately.
If granny is old and infirm and has diabeetus and needs her insulin, of course we should help. She is saddled with an ailment that she did not choose, her financial station is unlikely to change, and it is generally agreed that we take care of our elderly and disabled.
But let's say Johnny Entitled goes out and has lots of unprotected sex, contracts syphilis, and cannot pay for his treatment. Who pays for it? Me? I didn't have a say in Johnny's high-risk behavior, but I am saddled with the bill. He's free to fuck his brains out and deal with the consequences on his own, but he has no right to charge me and in so doing whittle away my freedom.
This can be extended to anything. Alcohol, tobacco, fast food, fried food, overeating, sexual promiscuity.... The list goes on. In order to ensure that Johnny Entitled doesn't do things that could cost me, we would have to ban a wide variety of activists across all of society. And there go more freedoms.
When solving society's problems, the solutions should provide everybody with more freedom, not less. Anything else is a failure and not the American way.
Bookmarks