I think there should have been some incentive to cooperate beyond manipulation. Like the cheat payout is 1 vs 2 (3-1).
Last edited by Doc Holliday; 06 Sep 2017 at 05:32 PM.
"Question the world man... I know the meaning of everything right now... it's like I can touch god." - bbobb the ggreatt
"Question the world man... I know the meaning of everything right now... it's like I can touch god." - bbobb the ggreatt
yeah, that was pretty good
This brings up a question I've had for about 10 years. City Crime > Town Crime, so could city crime be reduced by city planning focused on increased interactions in centralized neighborhoods of 1000 or less? Could Dallas, a city of 1,000,000, reduce crime if it were broken apart and restructured into 1000 self-sufficient pockets of 1000 residents and the immediate commercial and entertainment needs to support them?
Last edited by Doc Holliday; 07 Sep 2017 at 08:19 PM.
"Question the world man... I know the meaning of everything right now... it's like I can touch god." - bbobb the ggreatt
Cities are already broken up into pockets. They're called neighborhoods.
And doing more of that would just increase crime. People rarely hurt their own. Shitty people always justify their shittiness by creating a "other" out of the people in the other area.
Can art cross cultures or is it bound to the culture which creates it? If so, at what point does it become cultural appropriation?
"Question the world man... I know the meaning of everything right now... it's like I can touch god." - bbobb the ggreatt
Cultural appropriation isn't real.
I don't know, I would say that minorities trying to come up with guilt free forms of prejudiced and self inflected segregation so they can both participate in hate while holding onto a culture of victimization, is pretty real.
Bookmarks