Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Terminator 3000

  1. Terminator 3000

    Hannover House press release:

    Hannover House, the entertainment distribution division of Target Development Group, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: TDGI) (www.HannoverHouse.com), has entered into a feature film development venture with Vancouver-based Red Bear Entertainment, for "Terminator 3000," envisioned as a $70-million dollar budgeted, 3-D animated feature film based on the characters and situations introduced in the original "Terminator" feature. Hannover House C.E.O. Eric Parkinson previously served as C.E.O. of Hemdale Home Video, Inc. and Hemdale Communications, Inc., and handled the distribution of the original "Terminator" feature.
    Story details for "Terminator 3000" are being kept under close wraps, but the writers and production team have a stated goal of minimizing violence in order to obtain a PG-13 level of material.
    Hemdale produced and distributed director James Cameron's original "Terminator" feature, but released the sequel rights in 1990 to Carolco, which later transferred the rights to ultimately end up under the control of Halcyon Media. Santa Barbara based Pacificor, LLC prevailed in the most recent auction and transfer of rights to the franchise in January, and retains approval and licensing authority over the proposed "Terminator 3000" project.
    Hannover House and Red Bear Entertainment will release details of the production timing, financing and principal production personnel later this year, in advance of a proposed January, 2011 start.
    source

    Animated 3D PG-13 sequel to the first Terminator with a budget of $70 million called TERMINATOR 3000? DAY TWO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yoshi View Post
    If I'm going to be taxed, I'd rather it be to build a Death Star than to feed lazy Wookiees.

  2. We already had a sequel to Terminator, it was the best movie ever.

  3. so how do you make a terminator movie that lacks violence enough to get PG13? just rename the movie HARASSMENTBOT or something

  4. Quote Originally Posted by cka View Post
    so how do you make a terminator movie that lacks violence enough to get PG13? just rename the movie HARASSMENTBOT or something
    Terminator Salvation's theatrical cut was PG-13.

  5. well the theatrical cut sucks

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Chux View Post
    We already had a sequel to Terminator, it was the best movie ever.
    Empire Strikes Back was a sequel to Terminator? It all makes sense now. Yoda was the T-900 (years old).

  7. This franchise has been dead for years so this news does nothing for me.

    In related news, "mature" PG-13 action movies are making me crazy. Am I the only one who gets distracted by all of the bloodless violence? I swear, 97236592396 people die to horrible sword wounds (and worse) in Return of the King. No blood. There's an entire fight scene on a snow-covered mountain in Inception. Dozens dead, no blood.

    Either tone down the action or show the goddamned blood already. I hope PG-13 gets cancer.

  8. #8
    Amen, Brother Ed.

  9. #9
    Preach, preach!

  10. #10
    No Arnold, no sale.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo