All of them.
Just like Rayman 2.
Rayman 2's how old? (Also, still good!)
For someone trying to argue fun against popular releases why are you going by current popular discussion as the rating factor? Also, why did you pick a game a couple years old and two installments behind when comparing to the latest release of another series?
Because it illustrates that most series releasing these days are replacements for the former.
Maybe I should've said Brotherhood - the argument is still the same. Once Revelations came out, it replaces everything prior in the AC series. Same with Modern Warfare, Battlefield, etc. AAA is the Madden of gaming with few exceptions.
Rayman 2 is still fun to this day. The newest installment has that same flavor of appeal. It's fun and doesn't replace its predecessor.
Whereas with AC, I *just* started playing 2, find it brilliant, and can't find anyone who 1) finds it relevant today or 2) continues to play it after going forward with Brotherhood or Revelations.
Now, let's apply this title back to your original misguided post:
Why do you find it necessary to mention other games which you dislike in order to praise Rayman Origins?
Within the space of a few posts you manage to spend as much effort in voicing dislike for AC, some FPS shit, and Madden as you do to say you like Rayman Origins. What's the point? You use this phrase:
as if it is fact and completely disregard how the industry has worked for the past three decades.most series releasing these days are replacements for the former
Why do you post all of this worthless garbage just to say that you like a game. Why can't you just say that you like the game and leave it at that.