Saying that any restaurant should prefer patrons sitting around holding up tables simply because the one or two beers they're drinking over the course of an hour have a higher margin is hilariously short-sighted.
I know alcohol is where the money is - and I really do appreciate Hub's input and help outside of here. It's something Justi, Joey and I talked about and we decided to roll like this.
And, like I've said before, it's only been an issue once.
The most expensive wine on our list is $24 for a bottle. Since all our stuff is affordable anyway the servers don't have to try and 'sell' anything.
Boo, Hiss.
It depends what kind of restaurant you're running. Who gives a shit how long someone is there if they are spending money?
Every seat has a $ per hour it needs to be hitting to make your nut for the month. Alcohol helps tremendously.
I remember the LAST time something like this happened...
Donk
I don't think anyone is saying that.
Ic is arguing for a meal and no more than three drinks. Razor wants to sit around and drink more than 3+ drinks. And if he is drinking 3.50-4.50 drinks, he'll easily outspend the highest meal item on Ic's menu and his total will have a higher profit margin than food.
And it doesn't take a mathematical genius to figure out that you'd rather a guy spend 15 on an item that cost you .50 -1.00 an item, than a meal that might cost you 3.00-5.00 total.
I think the biggest cash cow in drinks is sweet tea. It cost something like.005 to make one glass of. That is even better than soft drinks that might cost .05-.25 to make.
Boo, Hiss.
I should say so! You shouldn't start a sentence with "And".
I feel it's fine in conversational writing.
Boo, Hiss.
Bookmarks