Says the guy that bought the $100 edition of DNF.
I see straight through your tastes.
Lots of people would argue Blizzard is not still Blizzard. And I fail to see how doing something years ago still counts.
I will put up EA's output in the last few years against anyone's and come out looking good. They crush Activision's output into the ground ten times over.
Says the guy that bought the $100 edition of DNF.
I see straight through your tastes.
Um, OK. Good one, dude.
The only reason EA is worse is because they lie to everyone's faces. I can't remember the last time Activision denied something that wasn't true, they just don't care.
Also bringing game taste into an argument is a really good way to remove any objectification.
I'm actually being kind of serious. Not extremely but a little.
Imagine the type of person that buys a PT Cruiser for double the normal asking price and then imagine they tell you they think Ford is better than Toyota or whatever, you'd take that with a grain of salt wouldn't you? When taking about quality of output by these companies taste is going to play a big part.
Mostly Im taking about their always on bullshit, money taking and origin though, of which Activision has nothing which compares. Even if some great games sneak past that, and they do, it doesn't make the massive gamer hating DLC and DRM excusable. I mean shit, online codes? Who else does that crap?
Last edited by Opaque; 06 Apr 2013 at 01:11 PM.
I said DNF was shit when I played it. Who cares what I paid for it.
You might want to research a bit about Activision, by the way.
I love Duke Nukem. The new one is an abomination. I bought the CE because I said if it ever came out, I'd pay whatever $ for it. I preordered it long before the game was released. I wouldn't have cancelled it either way.
The game is ass. It's not the worst game I have ever played but it certainly is the most disappointing one, IMO.
Bookmarks