The first one was a good, if incredibly linear game.
Hopefully the sequel addresses that issue.
LinkOriginally Posted by Joystiq
This will continue my pattern of sequels motivating me to actually play the original.
The first one was a good, if incredibly linear game.
Hopefully the sequel addresses that issue.
Boo, Hiss.
The first looked good and I almost picked it up, but it just kind of didn't happen.
Next time it goes up on steam for super cheap I'll give it a shot.
Metro 2033 was one that I had wanted to get around to, but fell into a timeframe when I had put over 200 hours into Fallout 3 and I just felt like it would be too similar so I skipped it. If I see it for cheap I'll probably grab it now that that time has passed, and maybe I can get in on this when it hits like I planned with the first.
Metro 2033 is like $10 on steam once a month, when it's not being given away free with some other THQ game. Surprised everyone on the planet doesn't have a copy by now. Good game, but not great. Worth playing for sure.
"I've watched while the maggots have defiled the earth. They have
built their castles and had their wars. I cannot stand by idly any longer." - Otogi 2
After I woke up from my seizure, I watched that again and thought it looked pretty good!
Live action trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mON5WmA5REk
It's a lot better than I expected.
This is now up on Steam with a May 14 release date.
There's a bit of interesting (to me at least) controversy surrounding this one. It has a Ranger mode that is basically its 1999 mode, but it's either a preorder bonus or $5 as DLC. Since I haven't gotten around to the first one yet, I'll probably grab this and the DLC for 50% off or something, so I'm not too offended. But, as a general rule, would you rather see additional difficulties or content held back for DLC?
Bookmarks