If she's the answer, the question would be "What would happen if Dax Flame, Emo Philips, and Jenna Marbles had a baby?"
There was a stabbing at an art exhibit in Miami that people fought was performance art.
Boo, Hiss.
If she's the answer, the question would be "What would happen if Dax Flame, Emo Philips, and Jenna Marbles had a baby?"
She's clever. Relative to most college students and such, at least.
This shit is so irritating on the chan. Isn't that fucking implied?
Though I probably shouldn't have been, I was rather surprised to hear Alan Colmes follow this to the letter last night.
I also was surprised earlier in the week to hear Prager say that Trump cannot be your man if you value truthfulness.
Anyway, one "Fix America" idea I've had in my head after reading the post - something along these lines. When a child is born in wedlock, it is issued an 18-year bond of some relatively large amount ($50K, whatever). Until it reaches maturity, if either parent ever not files MFJ, otherwise separates from the other spouse, or is charged with a felony, the bond is nullified. Perhaps a Coverdell would sound more egalitarian, but that calls into question whether such an amount to be ultimately used in for-profit post-secondary schools is necessary. Still, the overriding point is that EIC has propped up child bearing for a while, now it might be wise to entice a lifetime of household stability in some fashion.
I'm done for now, sorry.
>mfw tbh fam desu senpai
Some real cherry-picked nonsense, but still interesting.
...then again, the quotes snagged from the Koran probably are, too.
That's... an incredibly bad idea. Some marriages (hell, many) should end, and discouraging them from doing so (and worse, punishing the kid if they don't) is extremely counter-productive. We don't need to discourage divorce, we need to discourage the kinds of thinking that lead to marriages where divorce is the appropriate end beginning in the first place.
Yeah, I had seen that too. People at large have this bad habit of picking out which notions they want to support and identify with and then just flailing and shouting absentmindedly in order to do so.
Those that can take a stance on something but continue to absorb and process information objectively are far from the majority. At least in my experience.
So apparently a money-carrot stick isn't good enough. There's no overriding moral authority or social more to dissuade it in our society now.
Any suggestions? Mandatory pre-nups? Pass a written test to obtain a marriage license? Divorce tax? If you think what I had written was a bad idea, we can easily come up with worse ones. So how about something better, I guess.
Bookmarks