Page 1 of 6 1235 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: Star Trek (2009) part 3

  1. Star Trek (2009) part 3

    With Abrams occupied by Star Wars, rumor now has Jon M. Chu pegged to direct. I know most of you guys liked GI Joe 2, but this seems like just a terrible fit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gohron View Post
    I like doing stuff with animals and kids

  2. gi joe 2? DUBSTEP PHASERS

  3. Wub wub wub wub
    Quote Originally Posted by Razor Ramon View Post
    I don't even the rage I mean )#@($@IU_+FJ$(U#()IRFK)_#
    Quote Originally Posted by Some Stupid Japanese Name View Post
    I'm sure whatever Yeller wrote is fascinating!

  4. wat

  5. #5
    Weak.

  6. Why?
    I'm not a devious man by nature... but when you're unarmed, your tactics might gonna be downright Archimedean.

  7. Star Wars is now owned by Disney. Something has to fill the void for stupid science.
    "Question the world man... I know the meaning of everything right now... it's like I can touch god." - bbobb the ggreatt

  8. I'm not a devious man by nature... but when you're unarmed, your tactics might gonna be downright Archimedean.

  9. #9
    noobs

  10. So the definitive version will be exclusive to interwebs.
    I never watch the extras anyway, but that is some hamfisted marketing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Games.com logo