Yes. That is how it works. If you say god is real, the burden of proof is on you. Not the atheist.
Yes. That is how it works. If you say god is real, the burden of proof is on you. Not the atheist.
*walks away from yoshi slowly.
I would argue in that sort of debate both sides have a burden of proof.
you two dildos knew what I meant.
But you've never met a semantics argument you didn't like.
I actually don't know what you mean. It's the Socratic method. Everyone participates in the search for what is.
Considering I agreed with you on the comment about the best Sonic I'm not sure why you think I'm arguing semantics.
This is the debate that the Flying Spaghetti Monster was created for. Basically, the idea that God exists is equally as likely as the universe being created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster, and now I'm being told the burden of proof is on both the believer and non-believer? How about "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" instead?
Bookmarks